Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And complete what is like al-Tawilah *** and likewise what is like al-Jalilah."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And complete what is like al-Tawilah *** and likewise what is like al-Jalilah"
Tawilah is on the pattern fa'ilah. According to the rule, if you derive the nisbah from Tawilah, what do we say?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Tawili, Tawili, so we delete from it. But Ibn Malik says: "complete", meaning: without deletion. It is derived from its form, so what do we say for the nisbah to Tawilah?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Tawili, is that right? So this is like an exception to his statement here, yes?
"And fa'ili in fa'ilah, adhere to it"
Meaning, unless it is like Tawilah, Hawilah, yes?
The student: Hawili.
The Shaykh : Hawilah? He says Hawili. 'Alilah?
The student: 'Alili.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: 'Alili.
The Shaykh : 'Alili, that works.
The student: Qabilah?
The Shaykh : Let us look now at Tawilah. What is the reason... The reason: because it is mu'tal, mu'tal in the 'ayn, yes?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Tala, yatal, its 'ayn is mu'tal. It has a defect and needs... needs treatment. And since its 'ayn is defective, we leave it as it is. If, for example, we delete it... let its eye burst, so we say for Tawilah: Tawili, and we do not say?
The student: Tawli.
The Shaykh : Tawli, is that right? So every fa'ilah that is mu'tal in the 'ayn, yes?
The student: It remains as it is.
The Shaykh : It remains as it is.
"And likewise what is like al-Jalilah"
We also leave it in its original form, so what do we say for the nisbah to Jalilah, yes?
The student: Jalili.
The Shaykh : Jalili, and what do we say for the nisbah to Jamilah, yes?
The student: Jamili.
The Shaykh : Jamili, yes, ... okay. Qalilah?
The student: Qalili.
The Shaykh : Qalili. Why did it come out that way? Because it is mudaffa', mudaffa'. The lam came repeated in it, or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It has a mudaffa' letter. The lam came twice in it, so what do we say for Qalili? Yes? For Qalilah we say?
The student: Qalili.
The Shaykh : Qalili. Jalilah?
The student: Jalili.
The Shaykh : Azizah?
The student: Aziz.
The Shaykh : Azizah, Aziz?
The student: Mudaffa'.
The Shaykh : Mudaffa', is that right?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Shadidah?
The student: Shadidi.
The Shaykh : Shadidi. The summary now: everything we derive the nisbah from fa'ilah, yes? We say fa'ili, unless it is mu'tal in the 'ayn or mudaffa', mudaffa' in the 'ayn. Then it remains in its form. Okay. Unless there is a taa in fa'il or fa'ilah. If it is mu'tal in the lam, yes? It is attached to it.
"And attach that which is mu'tal in the lam and bare"
And if it is sahih in the lam, it is not attached. And what is reported from the Arabs is shadhdh, like Qurashi and Thaqifi.
The student: Was it reported from the Arabs?
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : What was reported from the Arabs confirms the words of Ibn Malik? Meaning, Qurashi is the one that was reported, and Thaqifi, and Hudhayl, Hudhali.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: But was it reported...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: The shadhdh is what was reported.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Huh?
Tawilah is on the pattern fa'ilah. According to the rule, if you derive the nisbah from Tawilah, what do we say?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Tawili, Tawili, so we delete from it. But Ibn Malik says: "complete", meaning: without deletion. It is derived from its form, so what do we say for the nisbah to Tawilah?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Tawili.
The Shaykh : Tawili, is that right? So this is like an exception to his statement here, yes?
"And fa'ili in fa'ilah, adhere to it"
Meaning, unless it is like Tawilah, Hawilah, yes?
The student: Hawili.
The Shaykh : Hawilah? He says Hawili. 'Alilah?
The student: 'Alili.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: 'Alili.
The Shaykh : 'Alili, that works.
The student: Qabilah?
The Shaykh : Let us look now at Tawilah. What is the reason... The reason: because it is mu'tal, mu'tal in the 'ayn, yes?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Tala, yatal, its 'ayn is mu'tal. It has a defect and needs... needs treatment. And since its 'ayn is defective, we leave it as it is. If, for example, we delete it... let its eye burst, so we say for Tawilah: Tawili, and we do not say?
The student: Tawli.
The Shaykh : Tawli, is that right? So every fa'ilah that is mu'tal in the 'ayn, yes?
The student: It remains as it is.
The Shaykh : It remains as it is.
"And likewise what is like al-Jalilah"
We also leave it in its original form, so what do we say for the nisbah to Jalilah, yes?
The student: Jalili.
The Shaykh : Jalili, and what do we say for the nisbah to Jamilah, yes?
The student: Jamili.
The Shaykh : Jamili, yes, ... okay. Qalilah?
The student: Qalili.
The Shaykh : Qalili. Why did it come out that way? Because it is mudaffa', mudaffa'. The lam came repeated in it, or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It has a mudaffa' letter. The lam came twice in it, so what do we say for Qalili? Yes? For Qalilah we say?
The student: Qalili.
The Shaykh : Qalili. Jalilah?
The student: Jalili.
The Shaykh : Azizah?
The student: Aziz.
The Shaykh : Azizah, Aziz?
The student: Mudaffa'.
The Shaykh : Mudaffa', is that right?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Shadidah?
The student: Shadidi.
The Shaykh : Shadidi. The summary now: everything we derive the nisbah from fa'ilah, yes? We say fa'ili, unless it is mu'tal in the 'ayn or mudaffa', mudaffa' in the 'ayn. Then it remains in its form. Okay. Unless there is a taa in fa'il or fa'ilah. If it is mu'tal in the lam, yes? It is attached to it.
"And attach that which is mu'tal in the lam and bare"
And if it is sahih in the lam, it is not attached. And what is reported from the Arabs is shadhdh, like Qurashi and Thaqifi.
The student: Was it reported from the Arabs?
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : What was reported from the Arabs confirms the words of Ibn Malik? Meaning, Qurashi is the one that was reported, and Thaqifi, and Hudhayl, Hudhali.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: But was it reported...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: The shadhdh is what was reported.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Huh?