Passing the Miqat without entering Ihram
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Q1: It is my custom to spend the last ten days of Ramadan in the Noble Makkah and to perform 'Umrah when I travel there from al-Ta'if. However, in a past year, I traveled there without performing 'Umrah, and I intended to perform 'Umrah at the end of the month from al-Tan'eem or al-Ja'ranah, and I actually did perform 'Umrah from there. My question now is: Do I owe anything for that 'Umrah which I intended to perform at the end of the month while I was in al-Ta'if, rather than when I descended from al-Ta'if? And if I do owe something but I am unable to do it, is it dropped from me, or is there a substitute? Knowing that we are one family consisting of 7 people.
A1: If you intended the 'Umrah from al-Ta'if but you entered the state of ihram from al-Tan'eem, then it is obligatory for you to pay a fidyah, which is slaughtering a sheep in Makkah that is acceptable as an 'Id sacrifice, to be distributed among the poor of the Haram; because you left off an obligatory part of the 'Umrah, which is entering ihram from the miqat of al-Ta'if, which is as-Sayl or Wadi Mahram, and whoever from
your family did what you did, he owes the same as you.
A1: If you intended the 'Umrah from al-Ta'if but you entered the state of ihram from al-Tan'eem, then it is obligatory for you to pay a fidyah, which is slaughtering a sheep in Makkah that is acceptable as an 'Id sacrifice, to be distributed among the poor of the Haram; because you left off an obligatory part of the 'Umrah, which is entering ihram from the miqat of al-Ta'if, which is as-Sayl or Wadi Mahram, and whoever from
your family did what you did, he owes the same as you.
Source
www.alifta.gov.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.