Reconciling the hadith (Whoever says there is no god but Allah will enter Paradise) with the hadith (The tale-bearer will not enter Paradise) and the hadith

The Shaykh : He says in it: So if, as we mentioned earlier, he has fulfilled the obligation of testimony, the text is to be taken at its apparent meaning, meaning he will not enter the Fire in any way. And if he was negligent, then the Fire here is interpreted as the Fire of the disbelievers, i.e., those who remain in it forever. He will enter the Fire to the extent that he fell short in his testimony, and then his destination will be Paradise. With this interpretation, many hadiths that appear to contradict each other are explained. For example: But he said: How is the reconciliation? And here he says: meaning the result is that the tale-bearer will not enter Paradise, or what is the hadith we mentioned earlier? The coward. And if he says there is no god but Allah, the reconciliation between the two hadiths... And if he says there is no god but Allah, he will not enter Paradise. In that case, the negation in the hadith: "will not enter Paradise" means with the foremost of the foremost, or "will not enter Paradise" means before seeing the painful punishment. Because he is either a tale-bearer or a coward, except after he is purified. At that time, he enters Paradise. So the entry that is negated in this hadith is not entry in an absolute sense, but rather entry either with the foremost of the foremost or without punishment.

The questioner : Beginning.

The Shaykh : Beginning.