Explanation that the hadith: (And as for Paradise, Allah will create a people for it and settle them in it) was inverted by some of the narrators, so he said: "And as for the Fire"

The Shaykh: And he brings an example of a hadith that was inverted by some of the narrators, and this is a correct example; where he said: "Just as it was inverted in some of the hadith: ; meaning the people of the Fire are thrown into the Fire, until he said: , so he said — meaning the narrator in whom the hadith was inverted — he replaced Paradise with the Fire, so he said: " ... So this wording, the word "Fire," was inverted upon the narrator; there is no doubt about this.
In summary: The occurrence of inversion in some hadiths cannot be denied, but it does not follow from the fact that a particular hadith was inverted that every hadith in the world was inverted upon the narrator. Inversion must be proven by conclusive evidence, like the example here: . This is from the favor of Allah — Mighty and Majestic — upon His servants. As for Him creating a people to torment them in the Fire without a cause; this contradicts the divine justice known in the decisive proofs of the Shari'ah, in addition to the fact that this narrator contradicted the trustworthy narrators who narrated the hadith correctly; where they said: .
I am bringing another example; meaning a person feels the inversion without studying the hadiths. The hadith that you all know, which is in "the two Sahihs" from the hadith of Abu Hurayrah — also — he said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: , the last of which is: . This is how the hadith is in "Sahih al-Bukhari" and others, and likewise in "Sahih Muslim," except that the last sentence was inverted by some of the narrators, so he said: . This is also an example of an inverted hadith; we have no doubt about its inversion.
But the fact that such an inversion occurred in these hadiths does not mean the soundness of Ibn al-Qayyim's claim. Also, the occurrence of inversion in the hadith: , he says: This is inverted, and perhaps it is: "And let him place his knees before his hands"; this is not conceded to him; because the hadith, as will be explained, is established from the Messenger (peace be upon him) with this wording, and the evidence is negated from the author in his claim of inversion, as will be explained, where he said in "Al-Tamim al-Kalam" he says: "Until I saw Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah," this is a connection to his previous statement that it was suggested to him that perhaps the hadith was inverted, but he wanted to say: I was just keeping it in my mind; because I did not have evidence, "until I saw Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated it likewise"; meaning: he narrated it with the wording: . At that time, Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) was reassured about what was circulating in his mind previously, that the hadith was inverted, and that the correct one is: "And let him place his knees before his hands"; why? He said: he saw in Ibn Abi Shaybah that he narrated it likewise: "So Ibn Abi Shaybah said: Muhammad ibn Fudayl narrated to us, from Abdullah ibn Sa'id, from his grandfather, from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him and his family) he said: — Ibn al-Qayyim's claim is valid up to now — , and al-Athram narrated it in his "Sunan" — also — from Abu Bakr likewise, and it has been narrated from Abu Hurayrah from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) what confirms that and agrees with the hadith of Wa'il ibn Hujr."