A general review of what pertains to the particles of negation.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The particles of negation for the subject and predicate are divided into three categories. Your name is Nasser.
The student: They are nouns, verbs, and particles.
The Shaykh : Error.
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : That is a mistake. Yes.
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: They raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : What raises the subject and puts the predicate in the accusative case.
The student: The second: What puts the subject in the accusative case and raises the predicate.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The third: What puts both in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : all
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Correct. This is accurate in terms of their grammatical function, but not in terms of whether the tool is a verb, a noun, or a particle. In terms of their grammatical function, they are divided into three categories: those that negate both the subject and the predicate, those that raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case, and those that put the subject in the accusative case and raise the predicate.
It was previously mentioned that *kana* and its sisters raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case. The raising of the subject does not mean it remains in its previous state; rather, it is a new raising caused by *kana*.
Similarly, *inna* and its sisters do the opposite: they put the subject in the accusative case, which is clear, and they raise the predicate. The raising of the predicate is not the initial raising that existed before *inna* entered the sentence; it is a renewed raising. Pay attention to this, because some people might say: "In *kana Zaydun qaiman* (Zayd is standing), Zayd is in the nominative case due to being the subject." We say: No, Zayd is in the nominative case due to *kana*. The raising that occurred to him is a renewed raising. In *inna Zaydan qaimun* (Indeed, Zayd is standing), some people might say that *qaim* is in the nominative case because it is the
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : predicate of the subject. We say: No, it is in the nominative case because it is the predicate of *inna*, as *inna* has granted it a renewed raising. For this reason, regarding *kana* and its sisters, it is said that *kana* raises the subject as a noun, as previously mentioned, and puts the predicate in the accusative case.
The student: They are nouns, verbs, and particles.
The Shaykh : Error.
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : That is a mistake. Yes.
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: They raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : What raises the subject and puts the predicate in the accusative case.
The student: The second: What puts the subject in the accusative case and raises the predicate.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The third: What puts both in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : all
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Correct. This is accurate in terms of their grammatical function, but not in terms of whether the tool is a verb, a noun, or a particle. In terms of their grammatical function, they are divided into three categories: those that negate both the subject and the predicate, those that raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case, and those that put the subject in the accusative case and raise the predicate.
It was previously mentioned that *kana* and its sisters raise the subject and put the predicate in the accusative case. The raising of the subject does not mean it remains in its previous state; rather, it is a new raising caused by *kana*.
Similarly, *inna* and its sisters do the opposite: they put the subject in the accusative case, which is clear, and they raise the predicate. The raising of the predicate is not the initial raising that existed before *inna* entered the sentence; it is a renewed raising. Pay attention to this, because some people might say: "In *kana Zaydun qaiman* (Zayd is standing), Zayd is in the nominative case due to being the subject." We say: No, Zayd is in the nominative case due to *kana*. The raising that occurred to him is a renewed raising. In *inna Zaydan qaimun* (Indeed, Zayd is standing), some people might say that *qaim* is in the nominative case because it is the
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : predicate of the subject. We say: No, it is in the nominative case because it is the predicate of *inna*, as *inna* has granted it a renewed raising. For this reason, regarding *kana* and its sisters, it is said that *kana* raises the subject as a noun, as previously mentioned, and puts the predicate in the accusative case.