Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And the condition for this to be an analogical measure is that it be *** a circumstance for what in its origin it was joined with."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He said:
"And the condition for this to be an analogical measure is that it be *** a circumstance for what in its origin it was joined with"
This is also complex. "Condition" is the subject, "condition" is a dependent noun and "being" is what it depends on, and "being" is a dependent noun, and "this" is what it depends on, and the demonstrative in his saying "this" refers to what was derived from the verb, because the demonstrative refers to the nearest mentioned thing, and "analogical measure" is the predicate of "being," the predicate of "being"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Do we have a "being" that takes a predicate and has a subject?
The student: Yes...
The Shaykh : What does Ibn Malik say?
The student: "And one not past, like it, may be used *** if the non-past one from it was used".
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
"And one not past, like it, may be used *** if the non-past one from it was used"
All right, where is the subject of "being" if we make "analogical measure" its predicate?
The student: Dependent on a name...
The Shaykh : Yes, dependent on the demonstrative name, which is the place of its subject, and his saying "that it be" "that" is a verbal noun particle and "be" is a present tense verb in the accusative case due to "that," and it is paraphrased with a verbal noun, and the estimation is: its occurrence, and it is the predicate of the condition, meaning: the condition for what was derived from the verb to be an analogical measure is that it be a circumstance for what in its origin it was joined with, meaning: for what was joined with it in the origin, for what was joined with it in the origin, meaning: "marama" when it becomes accusative for "rama," I hit the target of Zayd, but I sat from him at the range of the bullet, the range of the bullet?
The student: It is not an analogical measure.
The Shaykh : This is not an analogical measure, because it did not share with it in its origin, since the verb "sat" and the circumstance? "Marama," what is the meaning of analogical measure and non-analogical measure? Analogical measure means: you can pronounce something like it, you can pronounce something like it, and non-analogical measure means: you cannot pronounce something like it, and it is restricted to what the Arabs brought, the Arabs only, what the Arabs pronounced we restrict to it and what they did not, like the saying of the jurists this is an analogical measure and this is a devotional act ... the important thing, O people, Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) says: that the condition for what was derived from the verb to be a circumstance is that it be matching its operator in its root, matching its operator in its root, the operator of "marama" is?
The student: Rama.
The Shaykh : Rama, the operator of "majlis" is? Jalsa, right? All right, the operator of "maq'ad" is? Maq'ad.
The student: Qa'da.
The Shaykh : Qa'da, yes, all right, if I say: I stood before him at the range of the eye?
The student: Non-analogical measure.
The Shaykh : Analogical measure or non-analogical measure?
The student: No, non-analogical measure.
The Shaykh : How? I sat before him at the range of the eye.
The student: The root differed.
The Shaykh : The root differed, because this is "sat," and "manzar" is from "nazar" not from "sat," correct or not? This is not permissible to say: I sat from him at the range of the eye, it is not permissible because this is restricted to hearing, and it is not an analogical measure, so the conclusion is that the circumstance of place is restricted to directions and measures and the third?
The student: What was derived.
The Shaykh : What was derived from the verb, what was derived from the verb matching it, this what was derived from the verb is necessary, as long as what was derived from the verb means matching it.
"And the condition for this to be an analogical measure is that it be *** a circumstance for what in its origin it was joined with"
This is also complex. "Condition" is the subject, "condition" is a dependent noun and "being" is what it depends on, and "being" is a dependent noun, and "this" is what it depends on, and the demonstrative in his saying "this" refers to what was derived from the verb, because the demonstrative refers to the nearest mentioned thing, and "analogical measure" is the predicate of "being," the predicate of "being"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Do we have a "being" that takes a predicate and has a subject?
The student: Yes...
The Shaykh : What does Ibn Malik say?
The student: "And one not past, like it, may be used *** if the non-past one from it was used".
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
"And one not past, like it, may be used *** if the non-past one from it was used"
All right, where is the subject of "being" if we make "analogical measure" its predicate?
The student: Dependent on a name...
The Shaykh : Yes, dependent on the demonstrative name, which is the place of its subject, and his saying "that it be" "that" is a verbal noun particle and "be" is a present tense verb in the accusative case due to "that," and it is paraphrased with a verbal noun, and the estimation is: its occurrence, and it is the predicate of the condition, meaning: the condition for what was derived from the verb to be an analogical measure is that it be a circumstance for what in its origin it was joined with, meaning: for what was joined with it in the origin, for what was joined with it in the origin, meaning: "marama" when it becomes accusative for "rama," I hit the target of Zayd, but I sat from him at the range of the bullet, the range of the bullet?
The student: It is not an analogical measure.
The Shaykh : This is not an analogical measure, because it did not share with it in its origin, since the verb "sat" and the circumstance? "Marama," what is the meaning of analogical measure and non-analogical measure? Analogical measure means: you can pronounce something like it, you can pronounce something like it, and non-analogical measure means: you cannot pronounce something like it, and it is restricted to what the Arabs brought, the Arabs only, what the Arabs pronounced we restrict to it and what they did not, like the saying of the jurists this is an analogical measure and this is a devotional act ... the important thing, O people, Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) says: that the condition for what was derived from the verb to be a circumstance is that it be matching its operator in its root, matching its operator in its root, the operator of "marama" is?
The student: Rama.
The Shaykh : Rama, the operator of "majlis" is? Jalsa, right? All right, the operator of "maq'ad" is? Maq'ad.
The student: Qa'da.
The Shaykh : Qa'da, yes, all right, if I say: I stood before him at the range of the eye?
The student: Non-analogical measure.
The Shaykh : Analogical measure or non-analogical measure?
The student: No, non-analogical measure.
The Shaykh : How? I sat before him at the range of the eye.
The student: The root differed.
The Shaykh : The root differed, because this is "sat," and "manzar" is from "nazar" not from "sat," correct or not? This is not permissible to say: I sat from him at the range of the eye, it is not permissible because this is restricted to hearing, and it is not an analogical measure, so the conclusion is that the circumstance of place is restricted to directions and measures and the third?
The student: What was derived.
The Shaykh : What was derived from the verb, what was derived from the verb matching it, this what was derived from the verb is necessary, as long as what was derived from the verb means matching it.