What is the ruling on one who enters the state of ihram in his clothes until he passes the checkpoint, and what is required of them?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... If they want to go, they are prevented because they may have performed Hajj for the first time; they may have performed the obligatory Hajj, and the questions increase. They ask: Is it permissible for us to pass the miqat in our clothes?
The Shaykh : Without entering the state of ihram, you mean?
The questioner : They enter the state of ihram, but in their clothes.
The Shaykh : It is not permissible for them to wear the clothes.
The questioner : But we pass the area of ... and after we pass it, we take off the clothes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, I do not see this; I see that if they enter the state of ihram, they must adhere to the ruling of Allah.
The questioner : They are prevented, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : If they are prevented, this is something that has been unleashed upon them, so they should complain to Allah the Mighty and Majestic, and this prevention will be lightened.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Not in every case.
The questioner : ... Is being naked a condition?
The Shaykh : Yes, wearing a shirt is forbidden; he does not wear a shirt.
The questioner : I mean, it is not a condition.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is not a condition, but they sin.
The questioner : ... Passing the miqat, what is the evidence that if they pass it, a blood sacrifice is required of them?
The Shaykh : Let us leave the blood sacrifice aside, but it is forbidden for him, because the obligation of the blood sacrifice due to leaving an obligatory act is something in itself; there is nothing in it except the hadith of Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: And there is discussion in this, first regarding its authenticity, and second, whether it has the ruling of elevation or not. But the point is that they sin by consensus.
The questioner : I say, is there not some leeway in specifying the miqat?
The Shaykh : Leeway?
The Shaykh : Yes, there is leeway. When Rabigh was specified instead of al-Juhfah ... the wadi.
The Shaykh : But Rabigh is farther from Makkah than al-Juhfah, and the wadi is as it is; the wadi is this place from long ago.
The Shaykh : Without entering the state of ihram, you mean?
The questioner : They enter the state of ihram, but in their clothes.
The Shaykh : It is not permissible for them to wear the clothes.
The questioner : But we pass the area of ... and after we pass it, we take off the clothes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, I do not see this; I see that if they enter the state of ihram, they must adhere to the ruling of Allah.
The questioner : They are prevented, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : If they are prevented, this is something that has been unleashed upon them, so they should complain to Allah the Mighty and Majestic, and this prevention will be lightened.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Not in every case.
The questioner : ... Is being naked a condition?
The Shaykh : Yes, wearing a shirt is forbidden; he does not wear a shirt.
The questioner : I mean, it is not a condition.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is not a condition, but they sin.
The questioner : ... Passing the miqat, what is the evidence that if they pass it, a blood sacrifice is required of them?
The Shaykh : Let us leave the blood sacrifice aside, but it is forbidden for him, because the obligation of the blood sacrifice due to leaving an obligatory act is something in itself; there is nothing in it except the hadith of Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) who said:
Whoever leaves something of his ritual or forgets it, let him shed blood.
من ترك شيئاً من نسكه أو نسيه فليهرق دماًThe questioner : I say, is there not some leeway in specifying the miqat?
The Shaykh : Leeway?
The Shaykh : Yes, there is leeway. When Rabigh was specified instead of al-Juhfah ... the wadi.
The Shaykh : But Rabigh is farther from Makkah than al-Juhfah, and the wadi is as it is; the wadi is this place from long ago.