Is the commentator's statement that "idhan" is a particle of response and consequence correct?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The commentator here says that "idhan" is a particle of response and consequence.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : not
The Shaykh : What is the need for consequence? It may come without consequence; it is a particle of response in any case. But consequence... sometimes it is a consequence, meaning a reward for your action, and sometimes it is not a consequence. For example, if something does not require a consequence, you say, "Then such and such happens." It is not a particle of consequence.
The questioner : Or we estimated it with "illa."
The Shaykh : Yes, with "illa" or with "ila."
The questioner : ...[Al-Baqarah 2:237] came after it the article.
The Shaykh : It did not come, or
The questioner : It came, meaning for estimation, this is before "in."
The Shaykh : This "an" is independent. Is this independent "an" what, or
The questioner : In the "fa," the "waw," the "aw," and the permissibility.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : not
The Shaykh : What is the need for consequence? It may come without consequence; it is a particle of response in any case. But consequence... sometimes it is a consequence, meaning a reward for your action, and sometimes it is not a consequence. For example, if something does not require a consequence, you say, "Then such and such happens." It is not a particle of consequence.
The questioner : Or we estimated it with "illa."
The Shaykh : Yes, with "illa" or with "ila."
The questioner : ...
unless they forego the right
إلا أن يعفونThe Shaykh : It did not come, or
The questioner : It came, meaning for estimation, this is before "in."
The Shaykh : This "an" is independent. Is this independent "an" what, or
The questioner : In the "fa," the "waw," the "aw," and the permissibility.