The Discussion on the Nawasib
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes, yes, in the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions. The author (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “So, regarding the remaining nawasib”, and these, meaning the nawasib, are ten. An example of them is: “O Adam”
The student: The source particle
The Shaykh : Yes, an example of it
The student: I would like you to write it
The Shaykh : I would like you to write it like this. I would like you to write it. Parse it.
The student: I would like
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Present tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is a present-tense verb, raised, and its sign of being raised is the visible dammah on its end
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: “An” is a particle of accusative, and it is...
The Shaykh : Okay, the subject of “I would like,” or do we leave the subject for later? All right, “an”
The student: “An” is a particle of accusative
The Shaykh : A particle of source and accusative
The student: A particle of source and accusative
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is written as a present-tense verb in the accusative, and its sign of being in the accusative is
The Shaykh : In the accusative by what?
The student: It is in the accusative by “an,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : All right, “an” and “lan”
The student: “An” and “lan”
The Shaykh : An example
The student: In it is “You will not attain the knowledge of the unseen”
The Shaykh : The evidence
The student: “You will not attain”
The Shaykh : “You will not attain,” parse it
The student: “Lan” is a particle of accusative, and “attain” is a present-tense verb
The Shaykh : Complete
The student: A particle of accusative
Another student: And negation and future
The Shaykh : And negation and future. All right, “attain”
The student: “Attain” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by “lan,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah
The Shaykh : The visible fathah on its end. All right, well done. The brothers say the subject... “An” and “lan,” so let’s go
The student: I
The Shaykh : Who are you? You? No one is there. Yes
The student: ... that you review your lessons
The Shaykh : What?
The student: If you review your lessons, you will succeed. He said, “So then... then...”
The Shaykh : He said, “If I review my lessons, I succeeded,” and his companion said to him, “Then you will be happy.” Here, all right. So “thumma” (then) makes the verb accusative under conditions. Write them down for us. Write the conditions down for us.
The student: The first condition is that it is mentioned at the beginning of the speech. The second is that there is no separator between it and the present-tense verb
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, except
The student: A call or an oath comes...
The Shaykh : Yes, the third. Yes... Finish it. You, my brother, meaning, I stand up and put on your head that it is a verb and after it is future. All right, an example of it
The student: I do, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, you
The student: I say, “I will come to you in the morning,” and you say, “Then I will honor you”
The Shaykh : Then
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : how
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : Eid.
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : “I will honor you,” the conditions are complete. All right, parse “Then I will honor you”
The student: “Thumma” (then) is a particle of response and accusative
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: “I will honor you” is a present-tense verb
The Shaykh : “I will honor you,” just
The student: “I will honor” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by “thumma” (then), and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : All right, does it make the verb accusative if I say “Indeed, then I will honor you”
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: Yes... then
The Shaykh : All right, may Allah bless you. Praise
The student: For the missing condition
The Shaykh : And He
The student: It is not...
The Shaykh : Correct. If I said “Indeed, then I will honor you”, we would say it is wrong because it was not at the beginning of the speech. Correct the phrase
The student: Indeed, then I will honor you
The Shaykh : Well done. “Indeed, then I will honor you.” All right, if I said, “Sami, then if you visit me, I will honor you”
The student: Error
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: There is a separator
The Shaykh : There is a separator. Correct the phrase.
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : Correct. All right, we also returned to... that we make it a response to the condition, meaning that we make it emphatic. All right, “Indeed, I will honor you now”. Is this correct or not? “Indeed, I will honor you now”. No... “Then I will honor you now”. “Then I will honor you now”. Correct. How many conditions?
The student: Four.
The Shaykh : Mention them
The student: The verb is for the future, and there is no separator between it
Another student: That “thumma” (then) be...
The Shaykh : The conditions are complete. Complete now
The student: I
The Shaykh :“Then I will honor you now”. The conditions are complete in it
The student: No, it is not complete
The Shaykh : And what is missing?
The student: “Now” is not...
The Shaykh : Ah, if I said “now,” meaning in the present time, then it is not for the future. Correct the phrase
The student: “Then I will honor you now”
The Shaykh :“Then I will honor you now”. All right. All right, the author (may Allah have mercy on him) said, how, how, an example of it
The student: I submitted to Islam so that I would enter Paradise
The Shaykh : What?
The student: I submitted to Islam so that I would enter Paradise
The Shaykh : Well done. Parse it
The student: “I submitted” is a past-tense verb with the subject
The Shaykh : Okay.
The student: And “so that”...
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And “enter” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the explanatory “so that”
The Shaykh : What is it? The “so that” for the animal when it is sick, or something else?
The student: I said by a particle of accusative
The Shaykh : The particle of accusative, what is it?
The student: It is “so that”
The Shaykh : Zayn.
The student: And its sign of being in the accusative is the fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done. All right, let’s go, Khalid. The “lam” of “so that.” Give an example of the “lam” of “so that”
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, the “lam” of “so that.” The “lam” of “so that” does not come with “so that”
The student: ... for the sacred precinct
The Shaykh : Give an example.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It does not come. Give an example from yourself so that we know. Extend it
The student: ... to learn. I came to the mosque to study
The Shaykh : All right, “to study,” parse it
The student: The “lam” is a particle of accusative and explanation, and “study” is a present-tense verb in the accusative
The Shaykh : “I study,” like this
The student: I study
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: “I study” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the “lam” of “so that,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done, correct. All right, the “lam” of denial. Muhammad Salama, what does this denial mean?
The student: It is the one that comes after “kana” or “yakun”
The Shaykh : After what?
The student: “Kana” and “yakun”
The Shaykh : “Kana” or “yakun”
The student: “Yakun,” yes
The Shaykh : Wrong, Khalid
The student: It is the one that comes after the negated “kana”
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Good. After “what was” or “had not been” is better, or is it back to “the negated state”? This is broader, no doubt, but shorter is after “what was” or “had not been.” All right, let’s go, Salama. The “lam” of denial. What is the origin of the meaning of denial?
The student: Denial.
The Shaykh : Negation.[Ali 'Imran 3:179] Parse it
The student: The “lam” is the “lam” of denial, and “leave” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the “lam,” by the “lam” of denial
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done. All right, until we have taken it
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : All right, “until” is one of the conditions for making the present-tense verb accusative, and an example of it, O Abdul-Hamid
The student:[Taha 20:91]
The Shaykh :[Taha 20:91] Parse it
The student: “Until” is a preposition
The Shaykh : No, according to the author’s words, we do not say... “Until” is a particle of limit that makes the present-tense verb accusative. “Until” is a particle of limit that makes the present-tense verb accusative. All right
The student: The present-tense verb is in the accusative because...
The Shaykh : No, no, we are following the author’s school of thought
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
The student: He said ...
The Shaykh : By the visible fathah on its end. All right
The student: The source particle
The Shaykh : Yes, an example of it
The student: I would like you to write it
The Shaykh : I would like you to write it like this. I would like you to write it. Parse it.
The student: I would like
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Present tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is a present-tense verb, raised, and its sign of being raised is the visible dammah on its end
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: “An” is a particle of accusative, and it is...
The Shaykh : Okay, the subject of “I would like,” or do we leave the subject for later? All right, “an”
The student: “An” is a particle of accusative
The Shaykh : A particle of source and accusative
The student: A particle of source and accusative
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is written as a present-tense verb in the accusative, and its sign of being in the accusative is
The Shaykh : In the accusative by what?
The student: It is in the accusative by “an,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : All right, “an” and “lan”
The student: “An” and “lan”
The Shaykh : An example
The student: In it is “You will not attain the knowledge of the unseen”
The Shaykh : The evidence
The student: “You will not attain”
The Shaykh : “You will not attain,” parse it
The student: “Lan” is a particle of accusative, and “attain” is a present-tense verb
The Shaykh : Complete
The student: A particle of accusative
Another student: And negation and future
The Shaykh : And negation and future. All right, “attain”
The student: “Attain” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by “lan,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah
The Shaykh : The visible fathah on its end. All right, well done. The brothers say the subject... “An” and “lan,” so let’s go
The student: I
The Shaykh : Who are you? You? No one is there. Yes
The student: ... that you review your lessons
The Shaykh : What?
The student: If you review your lessons, you will succeed. He said, “So then... then...”
The Shaykh : He said, “If I review my lessons, I succeeded,” and his companion said to him, “Then you will be happy.” Here, all right. So “thumma” (then) makes the verb accusative under conditions. Write them down for us. Write the conditions down for us.
The student: The first condition is that it is mentioned at the beginning of the speech. The second is that there is no separator between it and the present-tense verb
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, except
The student: A call or an oath comes...
The Shaykh : Yes, the third. Yes... Finish it. You, my brother, meaning, I stand up and put on your head that it is a verb and after it is future. All right, an example of it
The student: I do, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, you
The student: I say, “I will come to you in the morning,” and you say, “Then I will honor you”
The Shaykh : Then
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : how
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : Eid.
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : “I will honor you,” the conditions are complete. All right, parse “Then I will honor you”
The student: “Thumma” (then) is a particle of response and accusative
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: “I will honor you” is a present-tense verb
The Shaykh : “I will honor you,” just
The student: “I will honor” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by “thumma” (then), and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : All right, does it make the verb accusative if I say “Indeed, then I will honor you”
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: Yes... then
The Shaykh : All right, may Allah bless you. Praise
The student: For the missing condition
The Shaykh : And He
The student: It is not...
The Shaykh : Correct. If I said “Indeed, then I will honor you”, we would say it is wrong because it was not at the beginning of the speech. Correct the phrase
The student: Indeed, then I will honor you
The Shaykh : Well done. “Indeed, then I will honor you.” All right, if I said, “Sami, then if you visit me, I will honor you”
The student: Error
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: There is a separator
The Shaykh : There is a separator. Correct the phrase.
The student: I will honor you
The Shaykh : Correct. All right, we also returned to... that we make it a response to the condition, meaning that we make it emphatic. All right, “Indeed, I will honor you now”. Is this correct or not? “Indeed, I will honor you now”. No... “Then I will honor you now”. “Then I will honor you now”. Correct. How many conditions?
The student: Four.
The Shaykh : Mention them
The student: The verb is for the future, and there is no separator between it
Another student: That “thumma” (then) be...
The Shaykh : The conditions are complete. Complete now
The student: I
The Shaykh :“Then I will honor you now”. The conditions are complete in it
The student: No, it is not complete
The Shaykh : And what is missing?
The student: “Now” is not...
The Shaykh : Ah, if I said “now,” meaning in the present time, then it is not for the future. Correct the phrase
The student: “Then I will honor you now”
The Shaykh :“Then I will honor you now”. All right. All right, the author (may Allah have mercy on him) said, how, how, an example of it
The student: I submitted to Islam so that I would enter Paradise
The Shaykh : What?
The student: I submitted to Islam so that I would enter Paradise
The Shaykh : Well done. Parse it
The student: “I submitted” is a past-tense verb with the subject
The Shaykh : Okay.
The student: And “so that”...
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And “enter” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the explanatory “so that”
The Shaykh : What is it? The “so that” for the animal when it is sick, or something else?
The student: I said by a particle of accusative
The Shaykh : The particle of accusative, what is it?
The student: It is “so that”
The Shaykh : Zayn.
The student: And its sign of being in the accusative is the fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done. All right, let’s go, Khalid. The “lam” of “so that.” Give an example of the “lam” of “so that”
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, the “lam” of “so that.” The “lam” of “so that” does not come with “so that”
The student: ... for the sacred precinct
The Shaykh : Give an example.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It does not come. Give an example from yourself so that we know. Extend it
The student: ... to learn. I came to the mosque to study
The Shaykh : All right, “to study,” parse it
The student: The “lam” is a particle of accusative and explanation, and “study” is a present-tense verb in the accusative
The Shaykh : “I study,” like this
The student: I study
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: “I study” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the “lam” of “so that,” and its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done, correct. All right, the “lam” of denial. Muhammad Salama, what does this denial mean?
The student: It is the one that comes after “kana” or “yakun”
The Shaykh : After what?
The student: “Kana” and “yakun”
The Shaykh : “Kana” or “yakun”
The student: “Yakun,” yes
The Shaykh : Wrong, Khalid
The student: It is the one that comes after the negated “kana”
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Good. After “what was” or “had not been” is better, or is it back to “the negated state”? This is broader, no doubt, but shorter is after “what was” or “had not been.” All right, let’s go, Salama. The “lam” of denial. What is the origin of the meaning of denial?
The student: Denial.
The Shaykh : Negation.
Allah would not leave
ما كان الله ليذرThe student: The “lam” is the “lam” of denial, and “leave” is a present-tense verb in the accusative by the “lam,” by the “lam” of denial
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And its sign of being in the accusative is the visible fathah on its end
The Shaykh : Well done. All right, until we have taken it
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : All right, “until” is one of the conditions for making the present-tense verb accusative, and an example of it, O Abdul-Hamid
The student:
until Moses returns to us."
حتى يرجع إلينا موسىThe Shaykh :
until Moses returns to us."
حتى يرجع إلينا موسىThe student: “Until” is a preposition
The Shaykh : No, according to the author’s words, we do not say... “Until” is a particle of limit that makes the present-tense verb accusative. “Until” is a particle of limit that makes the present-tense verb accusative. All right
The student: The present-tense verb is in the accusative because...
The Shaykh : No, no, we are following the author’s school of thought
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
The student: He said ...
The Shaykh : By the visible fathah on its end. All right