The Discussion on Tamyiz (Specification)

The Shaykh : All right, we want our brother Bandar to give us a tamyiz converted from the subject (fa'il)?
The student: Amr’s heart was pleased.

The Shaykh : You didn’t change anything.
The student: Amr’s heart was pleased.

The Shaykh : Leave "taba" (was pleased) and all the examples the author mentioned; we do not accept any of them.
The student: Zayd was blessed with knowledge.

The Shaykh : What?
The student: Zayd was blessed with knowledge.

The Shaykh : What does "Zayd was blessed with knowledge" mean? I don’t know what this meaning is. Leave what troubles you for what does not trouble you.
The student: Zayd was good in knowledge.

The Shaykh : Good in knowledge?
The student: Zayd was good in knowledge.

The Shaykh : Knowledge?! Why didn’t you say "character"?
The student: It is appropriate.

The Shaykh : Yes, but "knowledge" is not called "good"; it is said to be "abundant," "plentiful," etc. It is "character" that is called "good."
The student: There is no harm.

The Shaykh : Say: "Good." May Allah reward you. Avoid argumentation.
The student: Zayd was good in character.

The Shaykh : Character, what is the underlying structure?
The student: The underlying structure is: Zayd’s character was good.

The Shaykh : Correct. Parse it: "Hasuna Zaydun khuluqan" (Zayd was good in character).
The student: "Hasuna" is a past tense verb built for the passive voice.

The Shaykh : Built for the passive voice?!
The student: A past tense verb built on the fathah (open vowel).

The Shaykh : Now, when we said "by the strike," is it built for the subject or the object?
The student: It is active. Bakr struck Amr.

The Shaykh : All right, so what about "alima" (knew)?
The student: "Alima"?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Built for the passive voice.

The Shaykh : For the passive voice, because the penultimate letter is kasrah (short i), right? "Sima'" (heard)? Zayd heard his brother’s reading.
The student: "Sima'" is a past tense verb.

The Shaykh : Yes, but built for what?
The student: Built for the known.

The Shaykh : No, the penultimate letter is kasrah, so the rule for you is that if the penultimate letter is kasrah, it is built for the passive voice, yes? Or is this the second one that is built for the passive voice? What do you say, everyone?
The student: The first letter is dammah (short u).

The Shaykh : The first letter must be dammah, my brother. All right, in any case, "Hasuna"?
The student: "Hasuna" is a past tense verb built on the fathah.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Zayd is the subject, raised, and its sign of raising is the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, "khuluqan"?
The student: "Khuluqan" is a tamyiz, accusative due to tamyiz, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, well done, brother!
The student: Me?

The Shaykh : Yes, give us a tamyiz converted from the object (maf'ul bih)? From the object?
The student: We beat the criminal a beating.

The Shaykh : Good, yes.
The student: We beat the criminal a beating.

The Shaykh : What?
The student: We beat the criminal a beating.

The Shaykh : Here, "We beat the criminal a beating" means Usamah beat the criminal. Parse it.
The student: "Awsa'na" is a verb and a subject.

The Shaykh : Yes, break it down.
The student: "Awsa'" is a past tense verb built on sukun (silent) because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "na" is the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : attached or detached?
The student: Attached.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "The criminal" is the object, accusative. "A beating" is a tamyiz converted from the object, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, object. All right, tamyiz converted from the object, accusative by the visible fathah. Well done. We need a tamyiz for the number fifty. The number fifty. Yes, Khalid!
The student: Tamyiz for fifty?

The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: I bought fifty pens.

The Shaykh : The author said: "I bought."
The student: I sold fifty pens.

The Shaykh : Hahaha, all right, parse it.
The student: "Ba'at" is a verb and a subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Ba'at" is a past tense verb built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the taa: attached pronoun, built on dammah in the position of nominative subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Fifty" is the object, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the kasrah.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: And its sign of accusative is the yaa.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Yes, and "pen."

The Shaykh : Break it down.
The student: Should I break it down?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: In the object?

The Shaykh : Fifty.
The student: "Fifty" is the object, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the yaa, because...

The Shaykh : The yaa is a substitute for what?
The student: The yaa is a substitute for the kasrah.

The Shaykh : For the kasrah! Because?!
The student: Because!
Another student: First of all, it is a substitute for the fathah.

The Shaykh : He said it is a substitute for the kasrah, and the correct answer is?
The student: For the fathah.

The Shaykh : Yes, because?
The student: Because it is annexed to the plural of masculine sound.

The Shaykh : Yes, come on, finish it, brother!
The student: All right, "pen" is a tamyiz.

The Shaykh : Wait, and the noon?
The student: The noon is a substitute for the tanween in the singular noun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And "pen" is a tamyiz, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, come on, brother, specify a compound number for us?
The student: I ate eleven men.

The Shaykh : What?
The student: I ate eleven men.

The Shaykh : Hahahaha, around us or on us! How is this! All right, is this true or false?! Or one person every day?! It is possible that in eleven days it does not contradict, yes, did you eat?
The student: "Akalt" is a verb and a subject. "Akal" is a past tense verb built on the fathah.

The Shaykh : How is it built on the fathah?! "Akaltu"?
The student: A past tense verb built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The taa is a connected pronoun built on the dammah in the position of the subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Ahad 'ashar" (eleven):

The Shaykh : The correct thing is that I shortened it and did not parse it for you. The compound number is parsed as a whole, so it is said: "Ahad 'ashara" is the object, built on the fathah in the position of accusative, meaning we parse it as a whole. It is always built on the fathah. You say: "Ahad 'ashara," and "tis'a 'ashara" (nineteen), meaning they are built, yes.
The student: "Ahad 'ashar" is the object, accusative.

The Shaykh : No, it is built.
The student: Built on fathah.

The Shaykh : In the position of accusative.
The student: In the position of accusative.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Rajulan" (man) is the object.

The Shaykh : No, the object is eleven.
The student: A specification (tamyiz).

The Shaykh : Tamyiz.
The student: Tamyiz, accusative.

The Shaykh : Yes, come on, Muhammad, specify a thousand?
The student: A thousand?

The Shaykh : Yes, correct. Come on, it is not on you. What is the clarification?
The student: The clarification of the thing.

The Shaykh : And the separation?
The student: Between the two things.

The Shaykh : Ah, the clarification of the thing and the separation between the two things is called tamyiz. All right, in technical terms?
The student: It is the accusative noun that explains what is ambiguous of the entities.

The Shaykh : All right, come on, Salama, can tamyiz be a verb?
The student: It cannot be.

The Shaykh : What is the evidence from the author’s words?
The student: His saying: "It is the accusative noun".

The Shaykh : The verb is accusative, the accusative noun.
The student: The accusative noun.

The Shaykh : Because he said: "It is the noun". All right, so what is excluded by that?
The student: The verb and the subject.

The Shaykh : The verb and the subject. All right, well done. Can tamyiz be nominative?
The student: It cannot be nominative, because of his saying: "It is the accusative noun".

The Shaykh : Let it come from the author’s words?
The student: "It is the accusative noun".

The Shaykh :"It is the accusative noun", that’s it. What is the difference between tamyiz and hal (state) ya Hajjaj?
The student: Tamyiz is the explainer of what is ambiguous of the entities, and hal is the explainer of what is ambiguous of the states.

The Shaykh : Of the states, correct. That’s it. Did we mention that tamyiz has four types?
The student: The first type is that it is converted from the subject.

The Shaykh : For example?
The student: Zayd sweated a sweat.

The Shaykh : All right, parse it.
The student: "Tasabbaba" is a past tense verb.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Built on fathah.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Zayd is the subject, raised, and its sign of raising is the visible dammah on its end. "A sweat" is a tamyiz, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, how did we know that it is converted from the subject?
The student: It is correct if we said: Zayd’s sweat sweated.

The Shaykh : "Sweat" (accusative) or "sweat" (nominative)?
The student: "Sweat" (nominative).

The Shaykh : Zayd’s sweat, did it become his sweat?
The student: It became his sweat.

The Shaykh : It became his sweat, so it is the subject. That’s it. Come on, Bassam, the second one?
The student: The one converted from the object.

The Shaykh : From the object, for example?
The student: For example, His saying, Exalted is He: .

The Shaykh : Yes, "We caused the earth to spring forth springs." What told you that it is converted from the object?
The student: It is possible: We caused the springs of the earth to spring forth.

The Shaykh : Well done. That’s it. All right, parse it! Yes.
The student: The waw is according to what comes before it.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Fajjarna" is a verb and a subject. "Fajjara" is a past tense verb built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "na" is a connected pronoun built on sukun in the position of the subject.

The Shaykh : Yes, "the earth"?
The student: It is an object in the accusative case, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Springs" is a tamyiz, accusative, and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah.

The Shaykh : All right, well done. The third type?
The student: Tamyiz of the number.

The Shaykh : The number, which number?
The student: The compound one.

The Shaykh : Only the compound one?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Only the compound one?
The student: The non-compound number!

The Shaykh : The non-compound number.
The student: Meaning every number?!

The Shaykh : So only the compound number. Do not cram it into your mind. If you have knowledge, say yes or no.
The student: The compound one!?

The Shaykh : Yes, huh?
The student: The compound one.

The Shaykh : Only the compound one, yes.
The student: The words for tens.

The Shaykh : Where are you? All the words for tens?
The student: From twenty to ninety.

The Shaykh : Prevents?
The student: From twenty to ninety.

The Shaykh : So it is not all the words for tens, because ten, one hundred, and one thousand. All right, meaning twenty and its sisters. All right, come on, the brother gave an example?
The student:

The Shaykh : All right, parse: "I saw eleven stars."
The student: I saw: a present-tense verb, did I say a past-tense verb?

The Shaykh : Did you see all of it?
The student: Saw: a past-tense verb, built on sukun (stillness) because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the taa: a connected pronoun, built in the position of nominative case as the subject (fa'il).

The Shaykh : Built on what?
The student: Built on sukun!

The Shaykh : Pronounce it so you know what it is built on.
The student: On dammah (vowel).

The Shaykh : Okay, built on dammah, in the position of nominative case as the subject, eleven stars?
The student: Eleven: the object (maf'ul bihi).

The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: Accusative.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: Built on fathah.

The Shaykh : Eleven: the object, built on fathah (open vowel), in the position of?
The student: Built on the fathah.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Built on fathah.

The Shaykh : Built on fathah.
The student: In the position of accusative case.

The Shaykh : In the position of accusative case, okay, star?
The student: A specifier (tamyiz) in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : Yes, and its sign of accusative?
The student: The visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, where is the brother who says ten? Where is he?
The student: This is him!

The Shaykh : Eleven, we say: for the compound, meaning it is one word, like Baalbek and Hadramawt are compounds, they become one word, okay, brother, you!! We need the specifier for twenty and its sisters.
The student: Twenty and its sisters?

The Shaykh : Let's do twenty, leave its sisters for later.
The student: I saw twenty.

The Shaykh : What is twenty?
The student: I saw twenty lessons.

The Shaykh : Twenty lessons, okay, good, parse it, or shall we not keep using "I saw" because it has been repeated several times, let's find another one, O Shaykh.
The student: I opened twenty doors.

The Shaykh : Good, perfect, parse it.
The student: Opened: verb and subject, opened: a past-tense verb, built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : With the moving subject pronoun, yes.
The student: And the taa: subject, and twenty: specifier.

The Shaykh : That is not sufficient, complete it, detail it.
The student: The taa: subject.

The Shaykh : A connected pronoun.
The student: A connected pronoun, subject.

The Shaykh : Built on dammah.
The student: Built on dammah in the position of nominative subject.

The Shaykh : Yes, twenty?
The student: Twenty: a number.

The Shaykh : A number, but it has a grammatical position.
The student: Twenty: a specifier.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: A specification (tamyiz).

The Shaykh : No.
The student: Object, object (maf'ul bihi).

The Shaykh : Object, yes.
The student: Object in the genitive case!

The Shaykh : How is it in the genitive case?! Can the object be in the genitive case? Can the object be in the genitive case? Yes?
The student: Accusative.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: In the accusative case with yaa, because it is from the annexes of the sound masculine plural.

The Shaykh : With yaa in place of what?
The student: In place of the dammah.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: In place of dammah!

The Shaykh : In the accusative case with yaa in place of?
The student: The ya.

The Shaykh : How is it yaa? It is in the accusative case now, how is it yaa?
The student: In place of fathah.

The Shaykh : Yes, in place of fathah, and the noon?
The student: And the noon: a substitute for tanween (dual vowel).

The Shaykh : Yes, in the noun?
The student: The singular.

The Shaykh : The singular, okay, door?
The student: Door: a specifier.

The Shaykh : A specifier, yes.
The student: Accusative and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, what do you think if someone said: I opened twenty doors?
The student : Wrong.

The Shaykh : Wrong, which one is wrong, twenty or doors?
The student: Twenty is wrong.

The Shaykh : And doors?
The student: Doors is not wrong.

The Shaykh : No, doors.
The student: Doors?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Also wrong.

The Shaykh : So both are wrong?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Okay, they said: I bought twenty doors?
The student : Wrong.

The Shaykh : Which one is wrong?
The student: Doors, because it is a specifier.

The Shaykh : Yes, he said I bought twenty doors?
The student : Wrong.

The Shaykh : Wrong in what?
The student: The object cannot be in the nominative case.

The Shaykh : It cannot be in the nominative case, we must say twenty, good, come on Adam, the third type? The fourth? The fourth type? We took the one converted from the subject, the one converted from the object, and the number specifier, one remains, let's see if it doesn't contradict, come on Adam, do you have the text?
The student: .

The Shaykh : Okay, what is its definition?
The student: Meaning?

The Shaykh : What is its sign?
The student: Numbers.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: A number.

The Shaykh : No, it is with a number!!
The student: I have more money than you.

The Shaykh : Yes, it is not with a number. It can be a number, like more money, and it can be a description, like the most noble man.
The student: An attribute.

The Shaykh : You did not review the text, are you reviewing today?
The student: But I did not review all of it!

The Shaykh : But are you reviewing or not?
The student: Yes, I reviewed.

The Shaykh : You reviewed?
The student: Yes, exactly.

The Shaykh : What Allah willed!!!
The student: The fourth section: what came after the name of superlative and was not added to it.

The Shaykh : Good, it says: the fourth section, what came after the name of superlative and the name of superlative was not added to it, okay, give an example.
The student: Zayd is more wealthy than you in money, or Zayd is more noble than you in money,

The Shaykh : Zayd is more noble than you in money, parse it.
The student: Zayd: a subject (mubtada') in the nominative case, its sign of nominative is the visible dammah on its end, more noble: a name of superlative.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: More noble: a name of superlative.

The Shaykh : How? You said: more wealthy than you in money.
The student: Okay, more: the best subject in the nominative case, its sign of nominative is the visible dammah on its end, money: a specifier in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : Than you!.
The student: Than you: a preposition and its object, connected to more.

The Shaykh : Detail it.
The student: Min is a preposition, and the kaa: built on sukun.

The Shaykh : What? Min is a preposition and the kaa?
The student: And the kaa: a connected pronoun, built on sukun, in the position of genitive case with the preposition, and the preposition and its object are connected to.

The Shaykh : Built on sukun?!
The student: No, built on fathah, in the position of genitive case with the preposition.

The Shaykh : Fine.
The student: Connected to more, money: a specifier in the accusative case with the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Say: and the name of superlative was not added to it.
The student: And the name of superlative was not added to it.

The Shaykh : What does this mean?
The student: It means the name of superlative is not added to the specifier.

The Shaykh : Yes, what does this mean?
The student: It means if it is added, it will not be in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : For example?
The student: For example: Zayd's wealth is more than yours, no, no.

The Shaykh : No, no, my brother.
The student: Zayd is the most noble of people.

The Shaykh : The most noble of people, Zayd is the most noble of people, okay, this means it is no longer a specifier, because it was added to it? Yes, the name of superlative.

The questioner : O Shaykh, if we said: Zayd is the most noble of people in lineage, what would lineage be?

The Shaykh : Lineage would be a specifier, because more noble was not added to it.

The questioner : But if we added people to more noble?

The Shaykh : Yes, we said: and the name of superlative was not added to it, and the name of superlative was not added to it, so here it was added to something else, because lineage is separate from more noble, okay, are we done?
The student: Yes.
Another student: No, the number twenty-one remains.

The Shaykh : Good, the numbers twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, thirty-one, and ninety-one are the same thing, because what comes after ninety.

The questioner : It becomes a compound, meaning!

The Shaykh : No, it is not a compound, but what comes after ninety, after thirty, is in the accusative case, okay.

The questioner : Regarding compound numbers, regarding masculine and feminine, meaning, there is no distinction?

The Shaykh : Yes, we know this, we did not want to prolong it for you.

The questioner : If there is another day.

The Shaykh : We did not want to prolong it for you, because some people do not know any issue, we are looking for a conclusion on Thursday, but if you wish, we will take it.

The questioner : Meaning, it is not required from three to nine.

The Shaykh : Three to nine, and also one hundred and one thousand, all of these, look at the compound numbers like nine and its sisters, these are in the accusative case, okay.
The student: The time is up.

The Shaykh : Is it finished?
The student: It has ended.

The Shaykh : What is the fifth?
The student: What indicated fullness.

The Shaykh : Yes, what indicated fullness, fullness, like? I took, I think you?
The student: I did not take.

The Shaykh : Oh, Allah!
The student: I bought a full sa' of wheat.

The Shaykh : I bought a full sa' of wheat, because the earth being full of gold is not happening in the present time, I bought a full sa' of wheat, parse it?
The student: Bought: verb and subject, bought: a past-tense verb, built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun, and the taa: a connected pronoun, built on dammah, in the position of nominative case as the subject, full.

The Shaykh : Full.
The student: Full: an object in the accusative case, its sign of accusative is the visible fathah, and it is added, and sa': an object of addition in the genitive case by addition.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Wheat: a specifier in the accusative case, its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : In the genitive case by addition, and its sign of genitive?
The student: The visible kasrah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, wheat?
The student: A specifier in the accusative case, its sign of accusative is the visible fathah.

The Shaykh : The types are now five, okay, Ali says: I bought or I gave away nineteen books.
The student: I bought nineteen books.

The Shaykh : Yes, parse it.
The student: Bought: verb and subject, bought: a past-tense verb, built on sukun. And gave away?

The Shaykh : Yes, and gave away.
The student: Yes, Shaykh?

The Shaykh : I gave away eleven books.
The student: Gave away: verb and subject, gave: a past-tense verb, built on sukun because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun, the taa: a connected pronoun, built on dammah, in the position of nominative case as the subject, nineteen: an object in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : Which one is the object, nineteen or ten?
The student: Both.

The Shaykh : Both, because it is a compound.
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: An object, built on fathah, in the position of accusative case.

The Shaykh : In the position of accusative case?
The student: Accusative.

The Shaykh : Yes, book.
The student: Book: a specifier in the accusative case, its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, I have one hundred dirhams. Answer me precisely.
The student: I have it.

The Shaykh : Yes, I have one hundred dirhams.
The student: Parse it?

The Shaykh : Yes, I do.
The student: "Inda" (at): past tense verb!

The Shaykh : "Inda" is a past tense verb?!
The student: "Inda": a locative adverb, in the accusative case due to being a locative.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Inda": a locative adverb, in the accusative case due to being a locative, and the yaa: a pronoun.

The Shaykh : And the sign of its accusative case is?
The student: The fathah.

The Shaykh : The fatha, all right, where is the fatha?
The student: The one appearing on its end.

The Shaykh : Are you saying "inda" or "indi"?
The student: From me.

The Shaykh : All right, the dhal is not open.
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Inda!!!
The student: It is kasrah.

The Shaykh : It is kasrah, so what is the sign of its accusative case?
The student : The kasrah.

The Shaykh : You say that the kasrah is the sign of the accusative case only in the sound feminine plural.
The student: "Inda": a locative adverb, built on...

The Shaykh : It is not built; it is in the accusative case due to being a locative, and the sign of its accusative case is?
The student: The kasrah in place of the fatha.

The Shaykh : The kasrah in place of the fatha, when is the kasrah in place of the fatha?
The student: In the sound feminine plural.

The Shaykh : And is this a sound feminine plural?
The student: No.

The Shaykh : So it is wrong, extend it.
The student: I say: it is in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative case is the fatha, prevented from appearing.

The Shaykh : The fatha where?
The student: The assumed one.

The Shaykh : ...?
The student: The assumed one on the dhal, prevented from appearing by the occupation of the position by the kasrah appropriate for the yaa.

The Shaykh : "Inda": a locative adverb, in the accusative case due to being a locative, and the sign of its accusative case is the fatha assumed on the letter before the yaa of the first person, prevented from appearing by the occupation of the position by the movement of appropriateness, understood? All right.
The student: And the yaa...

The Shaykh : "Inda": a word with a suffix.
The student: "Inda": a word with a suffix, and the yaa: a pronoun built on..., a pronoun as a suffix built on...

The Shaykh : Inda.
The student: Built on the genitive, built on the suffix in the position of...

The Shaykh : What is this talk?! Inda.
The student: Built on sukun in the position of genitive by suffix.

The Shaykh : Yes, perfect, one hundred? I have one hundred dirhams.
The student: I have it.

The Shaykh : We are done with it, one hundred?
The student: One hundred?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: One hundred.

The Shaykh : I have one hundred?! It is back as you like, Muhammad?
The student: The preposition and the genitive are the predicate.

The Shaykh : Where is the preposition and the genitive?
The student: The addition.

The Shaykh : We do not say the preposition and the genitive.
The student: The suffix, excuse me.

The Shaykh : Yes, a fronted predicate, one hundred?
The student: Postposed subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Nominative with the dammah.

The Shaykh : The dammah appearing on its end, complete it: one hundred dirhams.
The student: One hundred dirhams: a specifier.

The Shaykh : A specifier?! The specifier: it is the noun in the accusative case, and this one says: one hundred dirhams.
The student: Dirham: object of the verb!

The Shaykh : How?! Consider!
The student: I did not attend.

The Shaykh : All right, so you are excused, come on, Muhammad, complete it.
The student: Dirham?

The Shaykh : I have one hundred dirhams.
The student: A specifier in the accusative case!

The Shaykh : So one hundred dirhams?! Or do we say we say one hundred dirhams?
The student: One hundred dirhams.

The Shaykh : Hah, so how do we say: a specifier in the accusative case?
The student: And the specifier of one hundred is in the genitive case.

The Shaykh : It does not contradict, but parse it.
The student: We say dirham: a specifier built...

The Shaykh : No, what?
The student: One hundred: a word with a suffix, and dirham: the word to which it is suffixed.

The Shaykh : One hundred: a word with a suffix and dirham: the word to which it is suffixed, in the genitive case by suffix, we told you: the specifier of one hundred, thousand, million, and billion is in the genitive case by suffix, and its parsing you say: one hundred is a word with a suffix, and what comes after it is the word to which it is suffixed.
The student: It is not a genitive specifier.

The Shaykh : It is a specifier but in the genitive case, meaning it is not the specifier we spoke about in the past, it is not the specifier, it is a specifier in the way of information, not in the way of parsing that it is a specifier in the accusative case, no, and Allah knows best, the noble one himself was present.
The student: "Hadara" (was present): past tense verb built on fath.

The Shaykh : "Hadara": past tense verb built on fath, correct.
The student: Your father, Abu: nominative subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the sign of its nominative case is the waw in place of the dammah because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : Yes, are the conditions complete? Are the conditions for its nominative case with the waw complete?
The student: Complete.

The Shaykh : What are they?
The student: Attached.

The Shaykh : Suffixed.
The student: To other than the yaa of the first person.

The Shaykh : To other than the yaa of the first person.
The student: And the kaff:

The Shaykh : The third thing?
The student: That it is singular.

The Shaykh : That it is singular, the fourth thing?
The student: That it is magnified.

The Shaykh : That it is magnified, the conditions for its parsing with letters in the five nouns are four: it must be singular, magnified, suffixed to other than the yaa of the first person, yes, come on.
The student: Nominative with the waw in place of the dammah because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And Abu: a word with a suffix, and the kaff: a connected pronoun built on fath in the position of genitive by suffix, the judge?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The judge: a descriptor for Abu, and the descriptor of the nominative...

The Shaykh : A descriptor for Abu and the descriptor of the nominative is nominative.
The student: Nominative and the sign of its nominative case is the dammah.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Himself or his eye?

The Shaykh : His eye.
The student: His eye: emphasis.

The Shaykh : All of it?
The student: No, just the eye.

The Shaykh : The eye.
The student: The eye: emphasis in the nominative case.

The Shaykh : Emphasis for what?
The student: Emphasis for Abu.

The Shaykh : For Abu.
The student: And the emphasis of the nominative is nominative like it, and the sign of its nominative case is...

The Shaykh : His eye.
The student: The dammah.

The Shaykh : His eye.
The student: The dammah.

The Shaykh : His eye, yes?
The student: The dammah.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: The visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : His eye?
The student: Yes, his eye.

The Shaykh : What do you say, everyone?
The student: Yes, indeed.

The Shaykh : Hahaha... All right.
The student: The eye: a word with a suffix, and the haa: a connected pronoun built on damm in the position of genitive by suffix.

The Shaykh : Well done, all right, ... yes?
The student: Regarding something like this: "The most knowledgeable of people came," from which type of specifier?

The Shaykh : We took it yesterday, we took it yesterday, that is enough.
The student: But we did not classify this from which of the places.

The Shaykh : No, no, it is not classified, the one after it, O Hasan! All right, the Muslims came, the possessors of honor.
The student: "Jaa" (came): past tense verb built on fath, and the Muslims: nominative subject with the waw.

The Shaykh : With the waw, complete it.
The student: Nominative with the waw because it is a sound masculine plural.

The Shaykh : Nominative with the waw?
The student: In place of the dammah.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Because it is a sound masculine plural.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The possessors.

The Shaykh : And the noon? In the Muslims? Come on, hurry, and the noon?
The student: In place of the tanween.

The Shaykh : In place of the tanween, all right.
The student: And the possessors.

The Shaykh : The possessors of honor.
The student: The possessors of honor, the possessors: one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: A descriptor.

The Shaykh : A descriptor, for what?
The student: The possessors of honor: a descriptor in the nominative case with the waw.

The Shaykh : A descriptor for what?
The student: A descriptor for the Muslims.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Nominative with the waw because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : No, are the possessors one of the five nouns?!
The student: Yes?

The Shaykh : The possessors?
The student: Raised.

The Shaykh : Yes, it does not contradict, nominative with what?
The student: With the dammah.

The Shaykh : Where?
The student: With a waw.

The Shaykh : With the waw, here, go.
The student: Nominative with the waw.

The Shaykh : With the waw, originally or in place of?
The student: In place of.

The Shaykh : About what?
The student: In place of the dammah.

The Shaykh : Of the dammah, correct, because the original is that the nominative is raised with the dammah, because? This is the point of difficulty, all your parsing is correct except the reasoning, because?
The student: Yes?

The Shaykh : Hah? Give the reason, my brother: nominative with the waw in place of the dammah because, we must know why the waw came in place of the dammah?
The student: Because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : No, you?
The student: Because it is one of the annexed plurals.

The Shaykh : Yes, what do you say, everyone?
The student: Correct.

The Shaykh : Is it authentic?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Because it is annexed to the sound masculine plural, because the possessors: a group, but the possessor is singular, you say: the possessor of wealth came to me, this is singular, but the possessors is a group, so because it is annexed to the plural?
The student: The sound masculine.

The Shaykh : All right, the possessors of honor?
The student: The possessors: a word with a suffix, and honor: the word to which it is suffixed, in the genitive case with the kasrah.

The Shaykh : In the genitive case by suffix, and the sign of its genitive case is?
The student: The kasrah appearing on its end.

The Shaykh : The kasrah appearing on its end, all right, come on, Ahmad, Allah the Exalted said: , !
The student: I: a separate pronoun built...

The Shaykh : I: a separate pronoun built.
The student: On sukun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: More: a predicate in the nominative case with the subject.

The Shaykh : The predicate of the nominative noun.
The student: The predicate of the subject is in the nominative case, and the sign of its nominative case is the dammah appearing on its end, from: from: a preposition, the kaff: a connected pronoun built, wealth: a specifier in the accusative case and the sign of its accusative case is the fatha appearing on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, from which type of specifier? -the brother questioner pay attention- yes, from which type of specifier? Come on, Ahmad.
The student: This specifier is a noun of the active participle, it comes after the superlative adjective and is not suffixed.

The Shaykh : If it is after the superlative adjective and not suffixed to it, perfect, all right: ?
The student: And the most honored, the waw is a conjunction.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The most honored: conjoined to more, and the conjoined to the nominative is nominative and the sign of its nominative case is the dammah appearing on its end, a group: a specifier in the accusative case and the sign of its accusative case is the fatha appearing on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, perfect, Allah the Exalted said: , yes.
The student: But: a particle of transition.
Another student: A preposition.

The Shaykh : A preposition?
The student: A particle from the particles of conjunction.

The Shaykh : Yes, that one mentioned the meaning to us and you mentioned the function to us, look everyone, when the particles of conjunction come to you at the beginning of the speech, you say: according to what comes before it, like you say: the waw according to what comes before it, you say: but according to what comes before it, yes, but: according to what comes before it, all particles of conjunction you say this, when they come at the beginning of the speech you say: according to what comes before it.
The student: All right, if we say: according to what comes before it, and what comes after it is a new parsing?

The Shaykh : Yes, a new parsing, yes.
The student: His hands: subject.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: His hands: subject.

The Shaykh : His hands.
The student: Subject.

The Shaykh : Yes, all of them together, his hands?
The student: Hand.

The Shaykh : Hand as a subject?
The student: Hand, hand.

The Shaykh : Hand: subject, hurry up.
The student: Subject, raised, and the sign of its raising is the dammah.

The Shaykh : No. Did you not study grammar at the beginning?
The student: Raised by alif, by the estimated dammah.

The Shaykh : No.
The student: It is raised.

The Shaykh : By what? Subject raised by what? By the beginning.
The student: Raised by the beginning.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The haa: attached pronoun, doer.

The Shaykh : Doer?! No.
The student: A direct object.

The Shaykh : No, it seems you have read only a little of grammar, continue.
The student: Hand: annexed, and the haa: annexed to it, built on damm in the position of genitive by annexation.

The Shaykh : All right, continue: spread out.
The student: ...

The Shaykh : No, no.
The student: A predicate.

The Shaykh : Predicate, what?
The student: Hand.

The Shaykh : Yes, predicate of the subject, continue? Are you finished, let's start with your brother, come on, he told you: predicate of the subject, there is only a little left!
The student: Marfu'.

The Shaykh : Raised by what?
The student: By the subject.

The Shaykh : By the subject, raised by the subject and the sign of its raising?
The student: The alif.

The Shaykh : All right, here, the alif is in place of what?
The student: In place of the dammah.

The Shaykh : In place of the dammah, because it is dual, and the noon?
The student: ...

The Shaykh : All right, perfect, did you get it? You bought twenty books.
The student: Bought: past tense verb, built on sukun because it is connected to the taa.

The Shaykh : To the moving nominative pronoun.
The student: Because it is connected to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the taa: attached pronoun, built on dammah in the position of nominative subject.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Twenty: object, accusative by yaa because it is annexed.

The Shaykh : In place of?
The student: In place of the dammah.

The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: In place of the fathah.

The Shaykh : In place of the fathah.
The student: Because it is annexed to the sound masculine plural.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the noon: in place of the tanween in the singular noun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Book: qualifier, accusative by the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Why is it accusative?
The student: Because it is a qualifier.

The Shaykh : Qualifier for the number whose qualifier is accusative.
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : All right, what is the number whose qualifier is accusative?
The student: The number whose qualifier is accusative is between twenty and ninety.

The Shaykh : Meaning twenty and its sisters, all right.
The student: And also the compound number.

The Shaykh : The compound number, all right, well done, who is next? Yes, did you get it?
The student: No.

The Shaykh : Parse: I passed by your father, the one of honor.
The student: Passed: past tense verb, built on sukun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Because it is connected to the moving nominative pronoun, it has no position in parsing.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Built on damm in the position of nominative as doer.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The waw is a preposition, and my father: genitive.

The Shaykh : What is it, a letter or a verb?
The student : A name

The Shaykh : A name.
The student : It is a noun in the genitive case.

The Shaykh : With what?
The student: By the baa.

The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because it is composed of two letters.

The Shaykh : Because it is composed of two letters, and if it is composed of two letters, then it?
The student: Composed of two letters!

The Shaykh : So something new!
The student: Something new.

The Shaykh : Wrong, by the baa, yes, but you said: generality, in any case, by the baa because it is composed of one letter, and what is composed of one letter is pronounced by its name, all right, so the baa: preposition.
The student: My father: genitive by the baa.

The Shaykh : And what is it?
The student: My father: genitive by the baa and the sign of its genitive is the yaa, in place of the kasrah because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: My father is annexed and the kaa is a pronoun built on.

The Shaykh : What type is this pronoun?
The student: A connected pronoun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Attached pronoun, built on fath in the position of genitive by annexation.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Of.

The Shaykh : Description of the genitive?
The student: Genitive like it, and the sign of its genitive is the yaa in place of the kasrah because it is one of the five nouns.

The Shaykh : Well done, and honor?
The student: Honor, of: annexed, and honor: annexed to it.

The Shaykh : Continue.
The student: Genitive and the sign of its genitive is the kasrah.

The Shaykh : Genitive by what?
The student: By annexation, and the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah on its end.

The Shaykh : All right, you said: it is one of the five nouns, by your father, do the five nouns take genitive by yaa?
The student: How?

The Shaykh : Do the five nouns take genitive by yaa?
The student: Yes, indeed.

The Shaykh : And accusative?
The student: With an alif.

The Shaykh : And nominative?
The student: With a waw.

The Shaykh : Perfect, all right, shall we take the third row?
The student: With me?

The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: From with me

The Shaykh : From with you? All right.
The student: With Bandar.

The Shaykh : Huh? Where?
The student: From with me, from here!

The Shaykh : Because you are in a row every day, that is not acceptable.
The student: Is it not from with him?

The Shaykh : Perhaps this brother is ready for parsing, all right, The noble man stood up.
The student: Stood: past tense verb, built on.

The Shaykh : On fath, Stood: its end is open, the man?
The student: The man: doer, raised and the sign of its raising is the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, the noble?
The student: Description: raised.

The Shaykh : Description raised.
The student: Description raised.

The Shaykh : Description of the man, and the description of the raised is raised, and the sign of its raising?
The student: The visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : The visible dammah on its end, all right, come on, are you ready, huh?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : All right, The man came from a far country.
The student: Came: past tense verb, built on fath.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The man: doer, raised by the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: From: preposition, and country: noun genitive by from and the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah, from a far country.

The Shaykh : Far.
The student: From a far country.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Far: description of country, genitive, and the description follows the described, and it is genitive by kasrah.

The Shaykh : Well done, perfect, the brother? !
The student: The waa: according to what comes before it.

The Shaykh : According to what comes before it, yes, do we not worship?
The student: No: negator.

The Shaykh : No: negator, all right.
The student: We worship: present tense verb, raised by the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the doer is a hidden pronoun, obligatory.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Its estimation is: we.

The Shaykh : Except Him.
The student: Except: tool of exception.

The Shaykh : No, here it is a tool of restriction.
The student: Yes, tool of restriction, Him, Him, Him.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is an object in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : Him all together?
The student: No, Him, object, accusative.

The Shaykh : Object of what? , parse the sentence from here, on your right.
The student : Hehehe.

The Shaykh : Come on.
The student: ...

The Shaykh : We worship is applied to Him, all right, so it becomes the object of we worship.
The student: Object of we worship.

The Shaykh : All right, the haa, Him?
The student: Him: annexed, and the haa: annexed to it.

The Shaykh : So they became two, this pronoun became one, pointing to two, and does this make sense or not?
The student: It will point to two.

The Shaykh : Who knows? Yes?
The student: The haa is a letter pointing to absence

The Shaykh : The haa is a letter pointing to absence, to absence, did you understand? It is not possible to annex a pronoun to itself, it is not possible, and ?
The student: Parsing of sincere?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: A state (hal).

The Shaykh : A Hal from whom?
The student: State from we worship.

The Shaykh : From we worship? Huh?
The student: From we worship.

The Shaykh : Yes, yes?
The student: State from the hidden pronoun in we worship.

The Shaykh : From the hidden pronoun in we worship, correct, come on, continue!
The student: Sincere:

The Shaykh : Continue, he says: state from the pronoun in we worship, complete it.
The student: Accusative by yaa.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Because it is plural.

The Shaykh : By yaa in place of?
The student: In place of?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: In place of sukun.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the noon: for the plural.

The Shaykh : All right, who is next?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : Yes, .
The student: Him: separate pronoun, built on sukun in the position of accusative as object.

The Shaykh : Yes, and the kaa?
The student: And the kaa: for address.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: We worship: present tense verb, raised and the sign of its raising is the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes, all right, continue, present tense verb raised by the visible dammah.
The student: .

The Shaykh : All right, continue, may Allah reward you with good.
The student: Present tense verb, raised and the sign of its raising is the visible dammah on its end.

The Shaykh : On its end, continue, complete the parsing, it is not finished yet.
The student: And the doer is a hidden pronoun, obligatory, its estimation is we.

The Shaykh : Yes, well done, the doer is a hidden pronoun, obligatory, its estimation is we.
The student: He did not say the kaa: letter of address!

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: He did not say the kaa: letter of address!

The Shaykh : I do not think he said: letter of address.
The student: He said: genitive by annexation.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Genitive by annexation.

The Shaykh : Are they saying?
The student: It is not genitive by annexation.

The Shaykh : Yes, correct, it is not genitive by annexation, because if you made Him annexed and the kaa annexed to it, they would be two, the annexed and the annexed to it, and they are one, so the pronoun Him and what comes after it: a letter pointing to address, or absence, or speech, these are the twelve separate pronouns, me, and you, and them, and what branches from them, come on, Abdullah!
The student: I got it.

The Shaykh : You got it? You have been absent for three days.
The student: I was busy.

The Shaykh : Receive it tonight, yes.
The student: ... qualifier.

The Shaykh : No, we do not give you a qualifier and you were absent, we give you a qualifier, no harm, Allah the Exalted said: .
The student: ?

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: We split, past tense verb.

The Shaykh : Split, or We split all together?
The student: Split.

The Shaykh : Yes, past tense verb.
The student: Built on fathah.

The Shaykh : Is the raa open for you?
The student: Not open, no.

The Shaykh : Regarding what?
The student: On sukun.

The Shaykh : Yes, because it is connected to?
The student: To the moving nominative pronoun.

The Shaykh : To the moving nominative pronoun, all right, na?
The student: Na?

The Shaykh : Yes, attached pronoun.
The student: Attached pronoun

The Shaykh : This is the one who leaves you, a dialect speaker from before!
The student: No, I am a dialect speaker, Shaykh.

The Shaykh : In any case, let’s find someone faster than you. Next to you on your right? Who is on your right? Is there no one? The one after him?
The student: Fajjara: past tense verb, built on sukun (stillness) due to its connection to the moving subject pronoun.

The Shaykh : Na?
The student: A connected pronoun.

The Shaykh : What? The na?
The student: *Na*.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: A pronoun built on damm (vowel) in the position of nominative subject.

The Shaykh : How?
The student: A connected pronoun in the position of nominative subject.

The Shaykh : What is it built on?
The student: Built on the dammah.

The Shaykh : Built on damm? Na?
The student: On the damma.

The Shaykh : And where is the damm in na?
The student: On the alif.

The Shaykh : There is no building on alif.
The student: On sukun (stillness).

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: On sukun.

The Shaykh : On sukun, okay.
The student: Al-ard (the earth): object, in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: 'Uyuna (eyes): a specification for the earth, and the specification of the accusative is in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : A specification for the earth? The earth does not need a specification; it is known.
The student: For the bursting forth.

The Shaykh : Yes, for the one who bursts forth, okay.
The student: Accusative and its sign of accusative is the visible fathah on its end.

The Shaykh : And what do you say, people?
The student: Correct.

The Shaykh : Correct? Okay, did you understand, Abdullah?
The student: Object of the verb.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Object!

The Shaykh : They say: A specification in the accusative case due to specification, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end.
The student: What type of specification is this here?

The Shaykh : The specification here is converted from the object, because the original is "We burst forth the eyes of the earth." Okay, look, everyone, it is better for a diligent person, if he misses a lesson, to ask about it and not let it go. You should look at the excellent brothers, the door, read to them.
The reader: And upon his family and all his Companions
The author said -may Allah have mercy on him-: " The chapter of exception, and the particles of exception are eight " .

The Shaykh :" And the particles of exception " , the hamza is connected, and the particles of exception continue on.
The reader: " And the particles of exception are eight, and they are: illa, ghayr, sawa, sawa, khala, 'ada, and hasa. So the excepted by illa is in the accusative case if the sentence is complete and affirmative, such as: The men stood up except Zayd, and the people went out except 'Umar. And if the sentence is a complete negative, then substitution and accusative case for exception are permissible in it, such as: The men did not stand up except Zayd, and except Zayd. And if the sentence is incomplete, it is according to the grammatical factors, such as " .

The Shaykh : Hasab.
The reader: " According to the grammatical factors, such as " .

The Shaykh : Nahwu, in the nominative case.
The reader: " Nahwu: The men did not stand up except Zayd, and I did not strike except Zayd, and I did not pass by except with Zayd, and the excepted by ghayr " .

The Shaykh : That is enough.