The Discussion on the Signs of Accusative Case
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : How many signs does it have? Yes, that is right.
The student: Four.
The Shaykh : How many signs does the accusative case have?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : How many signs does the accusative case have? You have not reviewed it.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Review it.
The student: Four signs.
The Shaykh : Incorrect.
The student: Five signs.
The Shaykh : Five signs, is that so? Good, count them for us.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Good, the author mentioned the alif after the fathah, so what is the reason?
The student: ... The fathah, when it is fully pronounced, turns into an alif.
The Shaykh : An alif came after it, so it does not turn into an alif, good. How do we parse the statement of the one who says: I honored the students (with fathah) or the students (with kasrah) or the students (with dammah)?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Not now, look at the students: I honored the students (with fathah) or the students (with dammah) or the students (with kasrah).
The student: The students (with kasrah).
The Shaykh : I honored the students (with kasrah).
The student: Because a preposition of genitive case entered it.
The Shaykh : A preposition, a sign of genitive case, and where is the sign of genitive case?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Alif and Lam are not a preposition, they are not a sign of genitive case. The signs of genitive case are min, ila, 'an, 'ala, fi, rub, ba, kaf, and lam, but how do we pronounce them?
The student: The students (with fathah).
The Shaykh : The students (with fathah), why did we make it accusative with the fathah?
The student: Because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : Because it is a broken plural, is that correct? Good, what taught you that it is a broken plural?
The student: The singular changed.
The Shaykh : Yes, what is the singular?
The student: The student.
The Shaykh : The student, and the change in the structure of the singular indicates three things. The change in the structure of the singular, good.
How do we say in this phrase: Your father stood up or your father (accusative) Adam, yes, this brother.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I say this phrase: Your father stood up, your father (accusative), correct it.
The student: Your father (accusative) stood up, your father stood up, your father stood up.
The Shaykh : Your father stood up, why?
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, abuka.
The Shaykh : I do not want you to parse it, why do you say that we say "your father stood up" because
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Because it is the subject, raised with the waw, correct? Good, parse it.
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, built on fathah. Abu is the subject, raised with the waw.
The Shaykh : The subject is raised with the waw, the subject is raised, and its sign of raising is the waw.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Because it is one of the five names.
The Shaykh : One of the five names, good. Do I say: Zayd's father stood up or Zayd's father (accusative) stood up? The question is yours: Zayd's father stood up or Zayd's father (accusative) stood up.
The student: Zayd's father stood up.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Why, why do we say Zayd's father and not Zayd's father (accusative)?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It is not one of the five names, the author says your father, the author says your father.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : But he said your father, and we say Zayd's father, Zayd's father is not your father, go on. Good, what is the condition for parsing it with the waw for raising?
The student: That it be singular, that it be large, that it be attached.
The Shaykh : Now it is attached, good. Whether it is attached to a pronoun or to an explicit noun, it is all the same. Good, do you say Basam, look, correct the phrase: The two Zayds stood up or the two Zayds (genitive) stood up, correct the phrase, yes, the two Zayds stood up or the two Zayds (genitive) stood up, everyone, come on, go, go.
The student: The two Zayds stood up, the two Zayds (genitive) stood up.
The Shaykh : It seems as if the guidance of Allah is preparing for the answer, come on, what do you say?
The student: The two Zayds stood up, because ... and its raising is with the alif in place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Did you hear, Basam, we say: The two Zayds stood up, so we raise it with the alif because it is dual, and the dual is raised with what? Ah, with the alif. Good, how do we say, Adel, correct the phrase: The men stand up (with waw) or the men stand up (with nun).
The student: The men stand up (with nun).
The Shaykh : Stand up (with waw), stand up (with nun), why?
The student: Because it is one of the five verbs ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, everyone, did you hear, he says: We say the men stand up (with nun) because "stand up" is one of the five verbs, and no marker of accusative or jussive entered it, so it is raised with what? With the presence of the nun. Good.
Correct the brother: The Muslim women stood up (with kasrah) or the Muslim women stood up (with dammah), it is not you, yes, you, you always ... on your companion, yes, the Muslim women stood up (with dammah) or the Muslim women stood up (with kasrah)?
The student: The Muslim women stood up.
The Shaykh : With the kasrah.
The student: The dammah.
The Shaykh : With the dammah, why?
The student: Because it is a sound feminine plural, it is raised with the dammah.
The Shaykh : With the dammah, correct. Good, a sound feminine plural, and the sound feminine plural is raised with the dammah. If someone said: The Muslim women came (with kasrah), we say this is wrong. The Muslim women stood up (with kasrah), we say this is wrong.
Good, parse: The Muslim women stood up (with dammah).
The student: Qamat is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes, and the taa.
The student: The taa of femininity.
The Shaykh : Good, and al-muslimat.
The student: The subject, raised with the dammah.
The Shaykh : Raised, and its sign of raising is the dammah.
The student: Visible.
The Shaykh : Visible on its end. Good, what do you say about kulla and kullata, brother, yes. Ah.
The student: Mustajad.
The Shaykh : Mustajad, good, brother.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Annexed to the dual.
The Shaykh : Annexed to the dual, what is the condition for annexing it to the dual?
The student: That it be attached.
The Shaykh : To.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Attached to which noun, or to a specific thing?
The student: To a pronoun.
The Shaykh : That it be attached to the pronoun. Good, you say: The two women came, both of them, parse it.
The student: Jaa'at is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Jaa' is a past tense verb, and the taa.
The student: The taa is the taa of femininity.
The Shaykh : Good, al-mur'atayn.
The student: Al-mur'atayn.
The Shaykh : Or al-mur'atayn (genitive).
The student: No, al-mur'atayn.
The Shaykh : Al-mur'atayn.
The student: The subject, raised.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And its sign of raising is the alif in place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Yes, because.
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual. Good, kullatahumaa.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Well done, but look, we told you, kullatahumaa is like kulluhum. The people came, all of them, and kull is for emphasis. Kullatahumaa, so it is for emphasis. Come on, kullatahumaa, kullata is for emphasis of al-mur'atayn, and the emphasis of the raised.
The student: Raised with the alif.
The Shaykh : With the alif in place.
The student: Of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Annexed to the dual, it is parsed like it.
The Shaykh : Well done, complete. Good, come on, Saleh.
Is the correct one: Two men stood up, two, or two men (genitive) stood up, two, or two men stood up, two, or two men (genitive) stood up, two? Four forms.
The student: Two men stood up, two.
The Shaykh : Which of these four is the correct one?
The student: Two men stood up, two.
The Shaykh : What do you say? Is it correct? This is the correct one. Good, parse it.
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, built on fathah.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Rajulan is the subject, raised, and its sign of raising is the alif in place of the fathah.
The Shaykh : The alif in place of what?
The student: Of the fathah.
The Shaykh : Of the fathah, glory be to Allah.
The student: Of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Ah, go on, because.
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Good, ithnan. So it is a specifier, so we must say ithnayn, because the specifier must be in the accusative case, and you said we say: ithnan.
The student: Emphasis.
The Shaykh : Emphasis for what?
The student: For rajulan.
The Shaykh : ...
The student: And the emphasis ... .
The Shaykh : And the emphasis follows the emphasized word, raised.
The student: Raised, and its sign of raising is the alif.
The Shaykh : In place.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual.
The student: Because ... because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual. Complete. Do you agree with this?
The student: We do not agree with him.
The Shaykh : He does not agree with you. Come on, Isa ... .
The student: Annexed to the dual.
The Shaykh : Annexed to the dual. Ithnan is annexed. Consider, O man, are you sure? We now have two opinions, which is the stronger? The second one. Ah, the stronger is Isa's, or Isa's opinion?
The student: Opinion.
The Shaykh : Good, fine. Good, so because it is annexed to the dual, why, Saleh, was it not made a true dual?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes...
The student: Because it has no singular from its own word.
The Shaykh : Because it has no singular from its own word, meaning, and the dual must be by an addition that replaced what? Two things that are similar in word and meaning. Good.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Never. And what is the mistake?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It serves as emphasis and serves as ... Good, no, it does not serve, because it does not take the place of the first. Good, I honored the Muslim women (with fathah), parse it.
The student: Akram is a past tense verb, the taa is the taa of the subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Al-muslimat.
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with fathah).
The student: Al-muslimat (with fathah) is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Yes, come on.
The student: Al-muslimat (with dammah).
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with dammah). Good, parse it.
The student: Al-muslimat (with dammah) is a sound feminine plural, raised.
The Shaykh : As it is.
The student: A sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : As what? And is every sound feminine plural raised?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : So, explain.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The student: I honored the Muslim women (with kasrah).
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with fathah) with the kasrah, yes, so the phrase is incorrect. I honored the Muslim women (with dammah) is incorrect. Ah. Did we not pass by the sound feminine plural, it is made accusative with what? With the kasrah in place of.
The student: The fathah.
The Shaykh : Parse it, come on. Akram is a verb and subject, al-muslimat.
The student: A sound feminine plural, accusative with the kasrah in place of the fathah.
The Shaykh : The object, accusative, and its sign of accusative is.
The student: The kasrah.
The Shaykh : In place.
The student: Of the fathah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : A sound feminine plural, correct, everyone? Good, Allah created the heavens (with kasrah), yes.
The student: Khalaqa is a past tense verb, built on fathah at its end.
Allah: The Name of Majesty, the subject, raised, its sign of raising is the visible dammah on its end.
Al-samawat: The object, accusative, its sign of accusative is the kasrah in place of the fathah, because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Correct? Good.
You say to the person: I saw your mouth (with fathah) or I saw your mouth (with dammah) or I saw your mouth (with kasrah).
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Three. I said three: I saw your mouth, I saw your mouth, I saw your mouth. The correct form is "I saw your mouth" and "I saw your mouth"?
The student: Among the conditions of the five names...
The Shaykh : So, "your mouth" is incorrect.
The student: "Your mouth" is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Incorrect.
The student: ... "your mouth" ... we do not say it is incorrect...
The Shaykh : But is it incorrect or not incorrect?
The student: No, it is not incorrect.
The Shaykh : Because it is a proper name, and "I saw your mouth," what is "mouth"?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Is it singular or plural?
The student: Singular.
The Shaykh : Singular.
The student: It is a singular name because it is one of the five names... not a plural.
The Shaykh : Okay, and "your mouth."
The student: But this is a singular name... a singular name.
The Shaykh : Okay, and if it is singular, why did we not parse it?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I mean, so it is correct for me to say "your mouth" based on another language, but in the well-known language, "your mouth" is correct, my brothers. Parse it based on "your mouth."
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It is not on the fathah.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Nor on the deletion of the vowel letter.
The student: Saw.
The Shaykh : I saw your mouth.
The student: I saw. Yes, this is built on sukun because the taa of the actor attached to it.
The Shaykh : Good.
The student: And "your mouth" is the object of the verb, marked with alif instead of fathah because it is one of the five names, and it is attached, and the kaa is the attached pronoun.
The Shaykh : Perfect, correct. Okay, do you say: I saw a man, yes, or a man?
The student: I saw a man, I saw a man.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because "saw" is the verb... the man is the object of the verb, marked with fathah.
The Shaykh : And it is marked with fathah?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : A man.
The student: A singular name.
The Shaykh : Is the singular name marked with fathah? Okay, and if you replaced it with "men."
The student: It is also marked with fathah because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : Ah.
The student: It is marked with fathah also because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : And if you replaced it with "men" (rajalaat).
The student: Rajalaat.
The Shaykh : Yes, I do.
The student: It is marked with kasrah instead of fathah because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Sound feminine plural, correct. Rajalaat, why?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... Singular? Rajalaat, because rajalaat is a plural formed on the feminine, so you say for "men" (rijal) "rajalaat," just as Allah the Exalted said: There is a reading Okay.
The student: It is annexed.
The Shaykh : No, no, it is a sound feminine plural, but it is a lexical feminine. For this, al-Zamakhshari says:
"My people gathered to kill me" I do not know what the second line is. He said:
"I do not care about their gathering *** Every gathering is feminine"
"Every gathering is feminine" Yes, okay. Come on, brother... parsing or not.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I mean, I will give you according to what we say. If we say "I honored the student," move the taa of the student: the student (with fathah), the student (with kasrah), or the student (with dammah).
The student: The student (with fathah).
The Shaykh : The student (with fathah), why?
The student: Object of the verb.
The Shaykh : Object of the verb, and it is a singular name, and the singular name is marked with fathah.
The student: With fathah.
The Shaykh : With fathah, perfect. We take the sign of deleting the noon.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : We take the sign, yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : What is it, what is it?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... Samadat is not a sound feminine plural, but I do not remember if we used it as an example.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : With Samadat, but as for 'Arafat, it became attached to the feminine because it is the name of a single place.
The student: The name of a single place.
The Shaykh : Yes, it does not indicate plurality.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, it does not matter, it does not matter, but because it is a single name that does not indicate plurality, like Adhra'at. Adhra'at is the name of a single place, so it is attached to the sound feminine plural because it does not indicate plurality.
The student: Four.
The Shaykh : How many signs does the accusative case have?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : How many signs does the accusative case have? You have not reviewed it.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Review it.
The student: Four signs.
The Shaykh : Incorrect.
The student: Five signs.
The Shaykh : Five signs, is that so? Good, count them for us.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Good, the author mentioned the alif after the fathah, so what is the reason?
The student: ... The fathah, when it is fully pronounced, turns into an alif.
The Shaykh : An alif came after it, so it does not turn into an alif, good. How do we parse the statement of the one who says: I honored the students (with fathah) or the students (with kasrah) or the students (with dammah)?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Not now, look at the students: I honored the students (with fathah) or the students (with dammah) or the students (with kasrah).
The student: The students (with kasrah).
The Shaykh : I honored the students (with kasrah).
The student: Because a preposition of genitive case entered it.
The Shaykh : A preposition, a sign of genitive case, and where is the sign of genitive case?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Alif and Lam are not a preposition, they are not a sign of genitive case. The signs of genitive case are min, ila, 'an, 'ala, fi, rub, ba, kaf, and lam, but how do we pronounce them?
The student: The students (with fathah).
The Shaykh : The students (with fathah), why did we make it accusative with the fathah?
The student: Because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : Because it is a broken plural, is that correct? Good, what taught you that it is a broken plural?
The student: The singular changed.
The Shaykh : Yes, what is the singular?
The student: The student.
The Shaykh : The student, and the change in the structure of the singular indicates three things. The change in the structure of the singular, good.
How do we say in this phrase: Your father stood up or your father (accusative) Adam, yes, this brother.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I say this phrase: Your father stood up, your father (accusative), correct it.
The student: Your father (accusative) stood up, your father stood up, your father stood up.
The Shaykh : Your father stood up, why?
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, abuka.
The Shaykh : I do not want you to parse it, why do you say that we say "your father stood up" because
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Because it is the subject, raised with the waw, correct? Good, parse it.
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, built on fathah. Abu is the subject, raised with the waw.
The Shaykh : The subject is raised with the waw, the subject is raised, and its sign of raising is the waw.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Because it is one of the five names.
The Shaykh : One of the five names, good. Do I say: Zayd's father stood up or Zayd's father (accusative) stood up? The question is yours: Zayd's father stood up or Zayd's father (accusative) stood up.
The student: Zayd's father stood up.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Why, why do we say Zayd's father and not Zayd's father (accusative)?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It is not one of the five names, the author says your father, the author says your father.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : But he said your father, and we say Zayd's father, Zayd's father is not your father, go on. Good, what is the condition for parsing it with the waw for raising?
The student: That it be singular, that it be large, that it be attached.
The Shaykh : Now it is attached, good. Whether it is attached to a pronoun or to an explicit noun, it is all the same. Good, do you say Basam, look, correct the phrase: The two Zayds stood up or the two Zayds (genitive) stood up, correct the phrase, yes, the two Zayds stood up or the two Zayds (genitive) stood up, everyone, come on, go, go.
The student: The two Zayds stood up, the two Zayds (genitive) stood up.
The Shaykh : It seems as if the guidance of Allah is preparing for the answer, come on, what do you say?
The student: The two Zayds stood up, because ... and its raising is with the alif in place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Did you hear, Basam, we say: The two Zayds stood up, so we raise it with the alif because it is dual, and the dual is raised with what? Ah, with the alif. Good, how do we say, Adel, correct the phrase: The men stand up (with waw) or the men stand up (with nun).
The student: The men stand up (with nun).
The Shaykh : Stand up (with waw), stand up (with nun), why?
The student: Because it is one of the five verbs ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, everyone, did you hear, he says: We say the men stand up (with nun) because "stand up" is one of the five verbs, and no marker of accusative or jussive entered it, so it is raised with what? With the presence of the nun. Good.
Correct the brother: The Muslim women stood up (with kasrah) or the Muslim women stood up (with dammah), it is not you, yes, you, you always ... on your companion, yes, the Muslim women stood up (with dammah) or the Muslim women stood up (with kasrah)?
The student: The Muslim women stood up.
The Shaykh : With the kasrah.
The student: The dammah.
The Shaykh : With the dammah, why?
The student: Because it is a sound feminine plural, it is raised with the dammah.
The Shaykh : With the dammah, correct. Good, a sound feminine plural, and the sound feminine plural is raised with the dammah. If someone said: The Muslim women came (with kasrah), we say this is wrong. The Muslim women stood up (with kasrah), we say this is wrong.
Good, parse: The Muslim women stood up (with dammah).
The student: Qamat is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes, and the taa.
The student: The taa of femininity.
The Shaykh : Good, and al-muslimat.
The student: The subject, raised with the dammah.
The Shaykh : Raised, and its sign of raising is the dammah.
The student: Visible.
The Shaykh : Visible on its end. Good, what do you say about kulla and kullata, brother, yes. Ah.
The student: Mustajad.
The Shaykh : Mustajad, good, brother.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Annexed to the dual.
The Shaykh : Annexed to the dual, what is the condition for annexing it to the dual?
The student: That it be attached.
The Shaykh : To.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Attached to which noun, or to a specific thing?
The student: To a pronoun.
The Shaykh : That it be attached to the pronoun. Good, you say: The two women came, both of them, parse it.
The student: Jaa'at is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Jaa' is a past tense verb, and the taa.
The student: The taa is the taa of femininity.
The Shaykh : Good, al-mur'atayn.
The student: Al-mur'atayn.
The Shaykh : Or al-mur'atayn (genitive).
The student: No, al-mur'atayn.
The Shaykh : Al-mur'atayn.
The student: The subject, raised.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And its sign of raising is the alif in place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Yes, because.
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual. Good, kullatahumaa.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Well done, but look, we told you, kullatahumaa is like kulluhum. The people came, all of them, and kull is for emphasis. Kullatahumaa, so it is for emphasis. Come on, kullatahumaa, kullata is for emphasis of al-mur'atayn, and the emphasis of the raised.
The student: Raised with the alif.
The Shaykh : With the alif in place.
The student: Of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Annexed to the dual, it is parsed like it.
The Shaykh : Well done, complete. Good, come on, Saleh.
Is the correct one: Two men stood up, two, or two men (genitive) stood up, two, or two men stood up, two, or two men (genitive) stood up, two? Four forms.
The student: Two men stood up, two.
The Shaykh : Which of these four is the correct one?
The student: Two men stood up, two.
The Shaykh : What do you say? Is it correct? This is the correct one. Good, parse it.
The student: Qama is a past tense verb, built on fathah.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Rajulan is the subject, raised, and its sign of raising is the alif in place of the fathah.
The Shaykh : The alif in place of what?
The student: Of the fathah.
The Shaykh : Of the fathah, glory be to Allah.
The student: Of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Ah, go on, because.
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Good, ithnan. So it is a specifier, so we must say ithnayn, because the specifier must be in the accusative case, and you said we say: ithnan.
The student: Emphasis.
The Shaykh : Emphasis for what?
The student: For rajulan.
The Shaykh : ...
The student: And the emphasis ... .
The Shaykh : And the emphasis follows the emphasized word, raised.
The student: Raised, and its sign of raising is the alif.
The Shaykh : In place.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : Because
The student: Because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual.
The student: Because ... because it is dual.
The Shaykh : Because it is dual. Complete. Do you agree with this?
The student: We do not agree with him.
The Shaykh : He does not agree with you. Come on, Isa ... .
The student: Annexed to the dual.
The Shaykh : Annexed to the dual. Ithnan is annexed. Consider, O man, are you sure? We now have two opinions, which is the stronger? The second one. Ah, the stronger is Isa's, or Isa's opinion?
The student: Opinion.
The Shaykh : Good, fine. Good, so because it is annexed to the dual, why, Saleh, was it not made a true dual?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes...
The student: Because it has no singular from its own word.
The Shaykh : Because it has no singular from its own word, meaning, and the dual must be by an addition that replaced what? Two things that are similar in word and meaning. Good.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Never. And what is the mistake?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It serves as emphasis and serves as ... Good, no, it does not serve, because it does not take the place of the first. Good, I honored the Muslim women (with fathah), parse it.
The student: Akram is a past tense verb, the taa is the taa of the subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Al-muslimat.
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with fathah).
The student: Al-muslimat (with fathah) is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Yes, come on.
The student: Al-muslimat (with dammah).
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with dammah). Good, parse it.
The student: Al-muslimat (with dammah) is a sound feminine plural, raised.
The Shaykh : As it is.
The student: A sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : As what? And is every sound feminine plural raised?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : So, explain.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The student: I honored the Muslim women (with kasrah).
The Shaykh : Al-muslimat (with fathah) with the kasrah, yes, so the phrase is incorrect. I honored the Muslim women (with dammah) is incorrect. Ah. Did we not pass by the sound feminine plural, it is made accusative with what? With the kasrah in place of.
The student: The fathah.
The Shaykh : Parse it, come on. Akram is a verb and subject, al-muslimat.
The student: A sound feminine plural, accusative with the kasrah in place of the fathah.
The Shaykh : The object, accusative, and its sign of accusative is.
The student: The kasrah.
The Shaykh : In place.
The student: Of the fathah.
The Shaykh : Because it is.
The student: Because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : A sound feminine plural, correct, everyone? Good, Allah created the heavens (with kasrah), yes.
The student: Khalaqa is a past tense verb, built on fathah at its end.
Allah: The Name of Majesty, the subject, raised, its sign of raising is the visible dammah on its end.
Al-samawat: The object, accusative, its sign of accusative is the kasrah in place of the fathah, because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Correct? Good.
You say to the person: I saw your mouth (with fathah) or I saw your mouth (with dammah) or I saw your mouth (with kasrah).
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Three. I said three: I saw your mouth, I saw your mouth, I saw your mouth. The correct form is "I saw your mouth" and "I saw your mouth"?
The student: Among the conditions of the five names...
The Shaykh : So, "your mouth" is incorrect.
The student: "Your mouth" is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Incorrect.
The student: ... "your mouth" ... we do not say it is incorrect...
The Shaykh : But is it incorrect or not incorrect?
The student: No, it is not incorrect.
The Shaykh : Because it is a proper name, and "I saw your mouth," what is "mouth"?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Is it singular or plural?
The student: Singular.
The Shaykh : Singular.
The student: It is a singular name because it is one of the five names... not a plural.
The Shaykh : Okay, and "your mouth."
The student: But this is a singular name... a singular name.
The Shaykh : Okay, and if it is singular, why did we not parse it?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I mean, so it is correct for me to say "your mouth" based on another language, but in the well-known language, "your mouth" is correct, my brothers. Parse it based on "your mouth."
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : It is not on the fathah.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Nor on the deletion of the vowel letter.
The student: Saw.
The Shaykh : I saw your mouth.
The student: I saw. Yes, this is built on sukun because the taa of the actor attached to it.
The Shaykh : Good.
The student: And "your mouth" is the object of the verb, marked with alif instead of fathah because it is one of the five names, and it is attached, and the kaa is the attached pronoun.
The Shaykh : Perfect, correct. Okay, do you say: I saw a man, yes, or a man?
The student: I saw a man, I saw a man.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because "saw" is the verb... the man is the object of the verb, marked with fathah.
The Shaykh : And it is marked with fathah?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : A man.
The student: A singular name.
The Shaykh : Is the singular name marked with fathah? Okay, and if you replaced it with "men."
The student: It is also marked with fathah because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : Ah.
The student: It is marked with fathah also because it is a broken plural.
The Shaykh : And if you replaced it with "men" (rajalaat).
The student: Rajalaat.
The Shaykh : Yes, I do.
The student: It is marked with kasrah instead of fathah because it is a sound feminine plural.
The Shaykh : Sound feminine plural, correct. Rajalaat, why?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... Singular? Rajalaat, because rajalaat is a plural formed on the feminine, so you say for "men" (rijal) "rajalaat," just as Allah the Exalted said:
As if they were camels of silver
كأنه جمالات صفرCamels
جمالاتThe student: It is annexed.
The Shaykh : No, no, it is a sound feminine plural, but it is a lexical feminine. For this, al-Zamakhshari says:
"My people gathered to kill me" I do not know what the second line is. He said:
"I do not care about their gathering *** Every gathering is feminine"
"Every gathering is feminine" Yes, okay. Come on, brother... parsing or not.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : I mean, I will give you according to what we say. If we say "I honored the student," move the taa of the student: the student (with fathah), the student (with kasrah), or the student (with dammah).
The student: The student (with fathah).
The Shaykh : The student (with fathah), why?
The student: Object of the verb.
The Shaykh : Object of the verb, and it is a singular name, and the singular name is marked with fathah.
The student: With fathah.
The Shaykh : With fathah, perfect. We take the sign of deleting the noon.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : We take the sign, yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : What is it, what is it?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... Samadat is not a sound feminine plural, but I do not remember if we used it as an example.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : With Samadat, but as for 'Arafat, it became attached to the feminine because it is the name of a single place.
The student: The name of a single place.
The Shaykh : Yes, it does not indicate plurality.
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, it does not matter, it does not matter, but because it is a single name that does not indicate plurality, like Adhra'at. Adhra'at is the name of a single place, so it is attached to the sound feminine plural because it does not indicate plurality.