Ruling on preventing pregnancy if it is harmful to the woman
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The last message in this session came from Abdul Latif Abdullah from al-Dalim in al-Kharj. He says: My wife is suffering from diabetes and high blood pressure. The specialist doctor has determined that pregnancy would cause her great harm or danger, and would also be dangerous for the fetus. Contraceptive pills harm her and cause other complications. He said there are only two options:
The first: closing or inverting the uterus.
The second: coitus interruptus. Please advise us on the best option. May Allah reward you with the best reward.
Answer:
If a treatment is available that makes inverting the uterus unnecessary, that is preferable. She may need a child, and the harm may disappear and the illness may improve, so she may need a child. She should be treated with what removes the harm or reduces the harm without inverting the uterus, so that she does not miss out on having a child if she desires it.
If coitus interruptus is sufficient in some cases, that is fine. There is nothing wrong with coitus interruptus, or another medication other than coitus interruptus that prevents pregnancy temporarily until the harm and the illness disappear. That is preferable.
As for the thing that terminates a pregnancy once and for all, this should not be done except in cases of dire necessity. Yes.
The last message in this session came from Abdul Latif Abdullah from al-Dalim in al-Kharj. He says: My wife is suffering from diabetes and high blood pressure. The specialist doctor has determined that pregnancy would cause her great harm or danger, and would also be dangerous for the fetus. Contraceptive pills harm her and cause other complications. He said there are only two options:
The first: closing or inverting the uterus.
The second: coitus interruptus. Please advise us on the best option. May Allah reward you with the best reward.
Answer:
If a treatment is available that makes inverting the uterus unnecessary, that is preferable. She may need a child, and the harm may disappear and the illness may improve, so she may need a child. She should be treated with what removes the harm or reduces the harm without inverting the uterus, so that she does not miss out on having a child if she desires it.
If coitus interruptus is sufficient in some cases, that is fine. There is nothing wrong with coitus interruptus, or another medication other than coitus interruptus that prevents pregnancy temporarily until the harm and the illness disappear. That is preferable.
As for the thing that terminates a pregnancy once and for all, this should not be done except in cases of dire necessity. Yes.
Source
binbaz.org.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
