What is the authenticity of the hadith: (If the one who drinks while standing knew what was in his stomach, he would vomit it up)?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner: O Shaykh, may Allah preserve you, on the same topic, Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "Abd al-Razzaq narrated to us, saying: Ma'mar narrated to us, from al-Zuhri, from a man, from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: Sunan al-Bayhaqi 10:1949. And Ahmad said: Abd al-Razzaq narrated to us, from Ma'mar, from al-A'mash, from Abu Salih, from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), with the like of al-Zuhri's hadith." I do not know, perhaps this is another route for it?
The Shaykh: It is another route, and in it is a man who was not named. From whom did this man narrate? Repeat it for me?
The questioner: Ahmad's chain of narration?
The Shaykh: No, no, not the entire chain, from a man?
The questioner: Yes, from a man, from Abu Hurayrah.
The Shaykh: From Abu Hurayrah, a supporting narration, meaning.
The questioner: It is Abu Salih, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner: The unspecified man here, it appears that he is Abu Salih.
The Shaykh: Abu Salih, the trustworthy one, meaning it is not far-fetched, but it is possible that it is Abu Ziyad.
The questioner: The chain of narration came again, and I recall that Ibn Hibban also narrated this hadith with a valid chain of narration.
The Shaykh: Did he name him Abu Salih?
The questioner: And it is Abu Salih.
The Shaykh: Yes, for this I say that the hadith is authentic. As for this chain of narration in itself, the man who was not named may be identified by tracing the routes, and the brother says that he is Abu Salih, and the one who memorized, or at least the one who recalled, is a proof against the one who did not recall.
If the one who drinks while standing knew what was in his stomach, he would vomit it up
لو يعلم الذي يشرب وهو قائم ما في بطنه لَاستقاءهThe Shaykh: It is another route, and in it is a man who was not named. From whom did this man narrate? Repeat it for me?
The questioner: Ahmad's chain of narration?
The Shaykh: No, no, not the entire chain, from a man?
The questioner: Yes, from a man, from Abu Hurayrah.
The Shaykh: From Abu Hurayrah, a supporting narration, meaning.
The questioner: It is Abu Salih, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner: The unspecified man here, it appears that he is Abu Salih.
The Shaykh: Abu Salih, the trustworthy one, meaning it is not far-fetched, but it is possible that it is Abu Ziyad.
The questioner: The chain of narration came again, and I recall that Ibn Hibban also narrated this hadith with a valid chain of narration.
The Shaykh: Did he name him Abu Salih?
The questioner: And it is Abu Salih.
The Shaykh: Yes, for this I say that the hadith is authentic. As for this chain of narration in itself, the man who was not named may be identified by tracing the routes, and the brother says that he is Abu Salih, and the one who memorized, or at least the one who recalled, is a proof against the one who did not recall.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.