What is the ruling on a pilgrim performing tamattu' who leaves the miqat boundaries and goes to the south of the Kingdom after 'Umrah?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : A family from Riyadh went to Makkah, and the head of the family wanted to perform Hajj as a mutamatti'. When they performed 'Umrah and he finished his 'Umrah and they all exited the state of ihram, he took them all to the south. Then he returned to Makkah. Is it obligatory for him to enter the state of ihram if he passes the miqat? That is one point.
The second point: If he travels beyond the miqat, is it also obligatory for him to enter the state of ihram?
The Shaykh : I mean, he is a mutamatti' and they are not?
The questioner : No, they only performed 'Umrah, may Allah protect you.
The Shaykh : The question is: Do his family members with him want to perform Hajj or not?
The questioner : No, no, only 'Umrah.
The Shaykh : And he is also like that?
The questioner : No, he wants to perform Hajj and 'Umrah.
The Shaykh : I mean, he left his family in the south and returned.
The questioner : They all came from Riyadh.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : And after they performed 'Umrah
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : he took them to the south.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : He returned to complete his Hajj.
The Shaykh : He left them in the south.
The questioner : And they remained in the south.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : He is asking, he is asking, is it obligatory for him?
The Shaykh : In any case, we understood that this man came from Riyadh with his family, they performed 'Umrah, then he took his family to the south, and perhaps the south is their residence. Then he returned in the state of ihram for Hajj, and when he performed 'Umrah he intended Hajj, so he is a mutamatti'. If he returns, if it is during the time of Hajj, he must enter the state of ihram; he must enter the state of ihram. If it is not during the time of Hajj, for example, if there are days remaining until Hajj, he enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah; he enters the state of ihram for a second 'Umrah so that he does not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram.
The second point: If he travels beyond the miqat, is it also obligatory for him to enter the state of ihram?
The Shaykh : I mean, he is a mutamatti' and they are not?
The questioner : No, they only performed 'Umrah, may Allah protect you.
The Shaykh : The question is: Do his family members with him want to perform Hajj or not?
The questioner : No, no, only 'Umrah.
The Shaykh : And he is also like that?
The questioner : No, he wants to perform Hajj and 'Umrah.
The Shaykh : I mean, he left his family in the south and returned.
The questioner : They all came from Riyadh.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : And after they performed 'Umrah
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : he took them to the south.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : He returned to complete his Hajj.
The Shaykh : He left them in the south.
The questioner : And they remained in the south.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The questioner : He is asking, he is asking, is it obligatory for him?
The Shaykh : In any case, we understood that this man came from Riyadh with his family, they performed 'Umrah, then he took his family to the south, and perhaps the south is their residence. Then he returned in the state of ihram for Hajj, and when he performed 'Umrah he intended Hajj, so he is a mutamatti'. If he returns, if it is during the time of Hajj, he must enter the state of ihram; he must enter the state of ihram. If it is not during the time of Hajj, for example, if there are days remaining until Hajj, he enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah; he enters the state of ihram for a second 'Umrah so that he does not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram.