Exegesis of the saying of Allah the Exalted: “And when Our clear verses are recited to them, they say, ‘This is nothing but a man who wants to turn you away from what your fathers used to worship…’”

The Qur'an clear in the language of our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) In this conditional sentence, which is the condition, its answer is and His saying: This is the negation. Why did it not function here? Because the negation was negated. Ibn Malik said in his Alfiyyah: “With the negation remaining, it is not employed; I did not employ ma below in with the negation remaining” So if the negation is negated, it has no grammatical effect, and Allah knows best.
“For those who wronged” But He said: “And We say to those who wronged” The explicit mention in place of the implied pronoun, as we mentioned, has a permanent, continuous benefit, which is alerting, and a specific benefit in each context according to its circumstances. Here, the intent is generalization, meaning for those who wronged among these people and others, and pointing to the cause of the ruling, which is His saying: What comes after? And the generalization and pointing to the operative cause of the ruling, which is injustice. Because if they had said, “And We say to them,” we would not have benefited from knowing that the reason for Allah’s saying to them and His rebuking them is injustice. Good.
He said: We begin with the grammatical analysis first. His saying: These are clear, is a state (hal) from because it is a description after a definite noun. A description after a definite noun, if it is indefinite, becomes a state (hal), and likewise if it is a sentence. Descriptions after definite nouns, if they are indefinite or a sentence, become a state (hal), and descriptions after a definite noun, if they are definite, become an attribute (na't). Both the state (hal) and the attribute (na't) are descriptions, but if it agrees with its antecedent in definiteness or indefiniteness, it is an attribute; otherwise, if the antecedent is definite and the second is indefinite or a sentence, it is a state (hal). And His saying: This is the answer to the condition, to the end. Allah the Mighty and Majestic says: Enter the class. When the verses of Allah are recited to them Meaning, manifest. What is their manifestation here? Is their manifestation in the sense that they are clear that they are the speech of Allah due to their inability to produce the like of them, or clear in what they indicate of noble meanings that humans cannot produce the like of, or both? It includes both. So it is clear in itself, clear that it is not from the speech of humans, and it is clear in its subject matter and what it indicates, that it is not from the judgments of humans, because it does not contradict itself and its parts do not lie to one another. And this indicates that it is from Allah. If these verses had been hidden, they would have had some excuse in rejecting them, but they are, yes, clear verses, and they have no excuse in rejecting them. And with this, Allah the Mighty and Majestic says: The author says in its exegesis: “Clear in the language of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), Meaning, the one who brought them and claimed that they are from Allah And look at how this sentence carries contempt and denial, which is well known. Their saying: They brought it in the form of the present tense, although he is absent, for contempt. And their saying: This is for denial, because they brought it in the form of an indefinite noun, as if they do not know him, as if he is a stranger to them. And they did not say, “What that man is but a man,” but they said: In contempt and denial Meaning, he does not want to guide you to the path of success, but rather to turn you away and prevent you from what your fathers used to worship. And what did their fathers worship? Idols from trees, stones, and others. This is the purpose of this man who brought these verses that were recited to them, and his purpose is not reform or improvement. Thus they responded to this false claim. And His saying: If they had said, “From what you used to worship,” it could have been said that they worshipped without a basis. But when they said: It is as if this worship of these idols is an established matter that the fathers were upon, and you should not leave the religion of your fathers. For this reason, they say, as Allah related from them in other verses: [Al-Zukhruf: 22] Or Two verses Of the idols. And the meaning of “fathers” here includes the direct fathers, the lower descendants, and the higher ancestors, or the highest, who are the grandfathers, however high up. And His saying: Are their mothers also like that? Yes, but a person is stirred up by loyalty to his father more than to his mother, because it is known that the father is a man, and a man is more rational than a woman. So if your fathers worshipped these idols and insisted on their worship, and they are the rational ones, then it is not fitting for you to follow this man who wanted to turn you away from what your fathers used to worship. And they said in the Qur'an: A lie Against Allah. I seek refuge in Allah. And they attacked the Messenger and attacked the Qur'an. They attacked the Messenger in the sense of his bad intention, that he does not intend reform, but rather wants to turn you away from what your fathers used to worship. And they attacked the revelation that this Messenger brought, and they said: And you know that this form is restriction. So according to their claim, there is nothing in the Qur'an that is true. The entire Qur'an, in summary and detail, is a lie, a fabrication. Meaning, a lie, and in itself a lie. And against whom? A fabrication against Allah. Because there is absolute lying that a person lies and does not attribute it to anyone, and here there is lying that a person fabricates against another. So they say the Qur'an is a lie and a fabrication against Allah. And there is no doubt that this is a false claim. So the Qur'an, as Allah described it: [Al-An'am: 115] And likewise, the Qur'an is from Allah the Mighty and Majestic, evidenced by the fact that Allah the Mighty and Majestic challenged these people to bring the like of it, and they did not bring it. And this is proof that it is from Allah, and all its reports are truth and reality, contrary to what these people attacked it with. So they attacked the Messenger and attacked what he was sent with, and attacking both is an attack on Allah the Mighty and Majestic. How? Because Allah’s enabling of this Messenger and supporting him and sending down verses upon him, while he is a liar, is wisdom or foolishness. It is foolishness, and Allah the Mighty and Majestic supports His Messenger with what He sends down to him and lists for him that it is truth. And the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) calls people openly and secretly. So if he were a liar against Allah the Mighty and Majestic, and Allah supports him and enables him, then Allah’s enabling of him would be the utmost of foolishness, and this is an attack on Allah the Mighty and Majestic. This is also a third false claim, but he came with the explicit mention in place of the implied pronoun, so he said, he did not say “and they said,” but rather: