Discussion of the grammatical parsing of the phrase of Allah the Exalted: (( yadhrāhu )).
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
He said: There is a grammatical issue with this verb, for it is the answer to the condition, and yet it is open. I say, my brother, yes, answer this issue: How was it open when it is the answer to the condition?
The student: The answer to the condition.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is the verb of the condition, the answer to the condition. So why was it open when it is the answer to the condition?
The student: Because it is a present-tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes, and is the present-tense verb raised or jussive?
The student: If a present-tense verb comes and the first verb is a past-tense verb, it is permissible...
The Shaykh : The first one is not a past-tense verb, O Shaykh.
The student:
The Shaykh : Are you grateful a past-tense verb? The past-tense verb is shakartum (you were grateful), and know that the derivation you made based on this is also wrong; it is not a past-tense verb, and the derivation is wrong.
The student: ... it makes one present-tense verb jussive.
The Shaykh : You have invalidated its ruling from the beginning of the world to today. You do not make jussive except one verb. Yes, or according to the opinion of those who say: "Religion is suitable for every time and place," and then they twist the necks of the texts so that they agree with their desires and their time. Yes.
The student: It is jussive by the deletion of the letter ya.
The Shaykh : The ya? Where is the ya?
The student: ... its end is a ya.
The Shaykh : Its end is a ya, yadhrī (he is pleased) meaning? yadhrīhu (he is pleased) for you.
The student: ... its end is a ya, and the ya was deleted.
The Shaykh : Was the ya deleted or something other than the ya? You have now answered with half.
The student: ... it is an alif with a kasrah.
The Shaykh : So the one that was deleted is the alif. So it is jussive by the deletion of the alif, correct, everyone?
He is pleased for you.
يرضَهُ لكمHe is pleased for you.
يرضه لكمThe student: The answer to the condition.
The Shaykh : Yes,
If you are grateful.
إن تشكرواHe is pleased.
يرضهThe student: Because it is a present-tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes, and is the present-tense verb raised or jussive?
The student: If a present-tense verb comes and the first verb is a past-tense verb, it is permissible...
The Shaykh : The first one is not a past-tense verb, O Shaykh.
The student:
You are grateful.
تشكرواThe Shaykh : Are you grateful a past-tense verb? The past-tense verb is shakartum (you were grateful), and know that the derivation you made based on this is also wrong; it is not a past-tense verb, and the derivation is wrong.
The student: ... it makes one present-tense verb jussive.
The Shaykh : You have invalidated its ruling from the beginning of the world to today. You do not make jussive except one verb. Yes, or according to the opinion of those who say: "Religion is suitable for every time and place," and then they twist the necks of the texts so that they agree with their desires and their time. Yes.
The student: It is jussive by the deletion of the letter ya.
The Shaykh : The ya? Where is the ya?
The student: ... its end is a ya.
The Shaykh : Its end is a ya, yadhrī (he is pleased) meaning? yadhrīhu (he is pleased) for you.
The student: ... its end is a ya, and the ya was deleted.
The Shaykh : Was the ya deleted or something other than the ya? You have now answered with half.
The student: ... it is an alif with a kasrah.
The Shaykh : So the one that was deleted is the alif. So it is jussive by the deletion of the alif, correct, everyone?