Discussion and parsing of the penultimate verse of the chapter on the Circumstantial Phrase.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : We forgot to parse "and the circumstantial phrase", the parsing?
The student: And the phrase?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : No.
The student: The waw is a preposition.
The Shaykh : It is a resumptive particle.
The student: A resumptive particle.
The Shaykh : A phrase of the subject.
The student: And the phrase.
The Shaykh : What is the phrase, and the circumstantial phrase is at the very beginning of the line.
The student: And the circumstantial phrase, a phrase of the subject.
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: And it is an annexed noun, and the circumstantial phrase is the annexed noun to it, except for the tool of exception.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is connected to what was mentioned before.
The Shaykh : Yes, and what is its grammatical status? Except for the tool of exception, what is its grammatical status.
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : No, Abd al-Rahman?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... No, no ... The commentator said, well, what do you think, Abd al-Rahman?
The student: Exception.
The Shaykh : Exception, what? Accusative or nominative.
The student: Accusative.
The Shaykh : Accusative for exception with a hidden fathah?
The student: On the alif.
The Shaykh : Well, continue.
The student: Continue?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is a relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : What is its grammatical status?
The student: Its grammatical status is accusative for exception.
The Shaykh : No, "sawa" is accusative for exception.
The student: Second predicate, second subject.
The Shaykh : Salama? Mahmud? Sami? Adel? What is your name?
The student: Ra'd.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Ra'd is my name.
The Shaykh : Ra'd?!
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ra'd, Allahu Akbar! Correct? Well, come on, Ra'd?
The student: It has no grammatical status.
The Shaykh : No, it has no grammatical status!! Muhammad?
The student: It is the annexed noun to it.
The Shaykh : The annexed noun to it! What is it?
The student: In the position of genitive, in the position of genitive by annexation.
The Shaykh : Where?
The student: And it is an annexed noun.
The Shaykh : "Sawa" is an annexed noun, and "ma" is the annexed noun to it?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Well, complete it?
The student: "Ma" is a relative pronoun in the position of genitive by annexation, mentioned before.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Correct?
The Shaykh : This is correct, Ibn Malik mentioned it.
"And make 'sawa' like 'sawa' of 'sawa' *** And make 'ma' for 'other' as the correct view"
And he said: "And except for a genitive with 'ghayr' as a declinable" Well, so "sawa" is an annexed noun and "ma" is the annexed noun to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive, here? Mentioned before?
The student: "Qudima" is a past tense verb built on fathah, and the alif is for duality, and the haa is a hidden pronoun estimated as "he," and the phrase of the verb and the doer has no grammatical status, it is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : Yes, wait, wait.
The student: Is the parsing correct?
The Shaykh : No, it is not correct.
The student: Which one?
The Shaykh : The last parsing.
The student: All the parsing?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Qadima" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: Built on fathah.
The Shaykh : Yes, the rest and the phrase?
The student: The relative clause.
The Shaykh : It has no status?
The student: From the parsing.
The Shaykh : From the parsing, not correct, well, and you? Here, Madyan?
The student: From the first?
The Shaykh : No, tell us this "Qudima."
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, no.
The student: "Qudima" is a past tense verb built for the passive.
The Shaykh : Yes, built for the passive, correct, complete it?
The student: And the alif is for generality.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the phrase.
The Shaykh : What after became a phrase until now.
The student: And the substitute for the doer is hidden, estimated as "he."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the phrase of the verb and its substitute is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : And its substitute? From the verb and its substitute?
The student: And the substitute for the doer, the verb and the substitute for the doer is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : Correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Which one is more correct now?
The student: Abd al-Rahman.
The Shaykh : Your neighbor, we do not accept your testimony for him, well, what do you say?
The student: The latter.
The Shaykh : The last one.
The student: The substitute for the subject.
The Shaykh : And "Qadima" is a past tense verb built for the unknown.
The student: But it is a preposition and a genitive.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: A preposition and a genitive.
The Shaykh : Where?
The student: Waw.
The Shaykh : No, no, no, well.
The student: It does not fit with the substitute for the doer.
The Shaykh : No, it does not fit.
The student: The alif...
The Shaykh : No, no, it does not fit, "sawa" "ma" "Qudima" the alif is for generality, well, let's start from the second row, come on, Saleh?
The student: Shaykh al-Waqt and five.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is not the case, with waw? But let's complete this, with waw?
The student: With waw, a preposition and a genitive, connected to a hidden word estimated as "existing" or.
The Shaykh : "Existing" what? And what is its grammatical status of "existing"?
The student: Predicate of "kana."
The Shaykh : Predicate of "kana" where?
The student: Second predicate for the phrase.
The Shaykh : Phrase where is its first predicate?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The preposition and genitive is the predicate of a hidden subject, or a predicate and a hidden subject estimated as "he."
The Shaykh : Predicate of a hidden subject?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Meaning it is with waw.
The student: It is with waw.
The Shaykh : What do you say, everyone? Because you are differing a little.
The student: The predicate of the first subject is connected.
The Shaykh : With waw, a preposition and genitive, predicate connected to a hidden predicate of the phrase, and the circumstantial phrase with waw, and his saying: "or with a hidden pronoun" is coordinated with his saying: "or with waw or with both".
The student: The rule?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: A rule.
The Shaykh : The rule: If the circumstantial phrase is not a present tense affirmative, it is permissible to connect it with waw alone, or with the pronoun alone, or with both together.
The student: And the phrase?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : No.
The student: The waw is a preposition.
The Shaykh : It is a resumptive particle.
The student: A resumptive particle.
The Shaykh : A phrase of the subject.
The student: And the phrase.
The Shaykh : What is the phrase, and the circumstantial phrase is at the very beginning of the line.
The student: And the circumstantial phrase, a phrase of the subject.
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: And it is an annexed noun, and the circumstantial phrase is the annexed noun to it, except for the tool of exception.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is connected to what was mentioned before.
The Shaykh : Yes, and what is its grammatical status? Except for the tool of exception, what is its grammatical status.
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : No, Abd al-Rahman?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... No, no ... The commentator said, well, what do you think, Abd al-Rahman?
The student: Exception.
The Shaykh : Exception, what? Accusative or nominative.
The student: Accusative.
The Shaykh : Accusative for exception with a hidden fathah?
The student: On the alif.
The Shaykh : Well, continue.
The student: Continue?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is a relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : What is its grammatical status?
The student: Its grammatical status is accusative for exception.
The Shaykh : No, "sawa" is accusative for exception.
The student: Second predicate, second subject.
The Shaykh : Salama? Mahmud? Sami? Adel? What is your name?
The student: Ra'd.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Ra'd is my name.
The Shaykh : Ra'd?!
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ra'd, Allahu Akbar! Correct? Well, come on, Ra'd?
The student: It has no grammatical status.
The Shaykh : No, it has no grammatical status!! Muhammad?
The student: It is the annexed noun to it.
The Shaykh : The annexed noun to it! What is it?
The student: In the position of genitive, in the position of genitive by annexation.
The Shaykh : Where?
The student: And it is an annexed noun.
The Shaykh : "Sawa" is an annexed noun, and "ma" is the annexed noun to it?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Well, complete it?
The student: "Ma" is a relative pronoun in the position of genitive by annexation, mentioned before.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Correct?
The Shaykh : This is correct, Ibn Malik mentioned it.
"And make 'sawa' like 'sawa' of 'sawa' *** And make 'ma' for 'other' as the correct view"
And he said: "And except for a genitive with 'ghayr' as a declinable" Well, so "sawa" is an annexed noun and "ma" is the annexed noun to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive, here? Mentioned before?
The student: "Qudima" is a past tense verb built on fathah, and the alif is for duality, and the haa is a hidden pronoun estimated as "he," and the phrase of the verb and the doer has no grammatical status, it is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : Yes, wait, wait.
The student: Is the parsing correct?
The Shaykh : No, it is not correct.
The student: Which one?
The Shaykh : The last parsing.
The student: All the parsing?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Qadima" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Very well.
The student: Built on fathah.
The Shaykh : Yes, the rest and the phrase?
The student: The relative clause.
The Shaykh : It has no status?
The student: From the parsing.
The Shaykh : From the parsing, not correct, well, and you? Here, Madyan?
The student: From the first?
The Shaykh : No, tell us this "Qudima."
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, no.
The student: "Qudima" is a past tense verb built for the passive.
The Shaykh : Yes, built for the passive, correct, complete it?
The student: And the alif is for generality.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the phrase.
The Shaykh : What after became a phrase until now.
The student: And the substitute for the doer is hidden, estimated as "he."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the phrase of the verb and its substitute is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : And its substitute? From the verb and its substitute?
The student: And the substitute for the doer, the verb and the substitute for the doer is the relative clause of the relative pronoun.
The Shaykh : Correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Which one is more correct now?
The student: Abd al-Rahman.
The Shaykh : Your neighbor, we do not accept your testimony for him, well, what do you say?
The student: The latter.
The Shaykh : The last one.
The student: The substitute for the subject.
The Shaykh : And "Qadima" is a past tense verb built for the unknown.
The student: But it is a preposition and a genitive.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: A preposition and a genitive.
The Shaykh : Where?
The student: Waw.
The Shaykh : No, no, no, well.
The student: It does not fit with the substitute for the doer.
The Shaykh : No, it does not fit.
The student: The alif...
The Shaykh : No, no, it does not fit, "sawa" "ma" "Qudima" the alif is for generality, well, let's start from the second row, come on, Saleh?
The student: Shaykh al-Waqt and five.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is not the case, with waw? But let's complete this, with waw?
The student: With waw, a preposition and a genitive, connected to a hidden word estimated as "existing" or.
The Shaykh : "Existing" what? And what is its grammatical status of "existing"?
The student: Predicate of "kana."
The Shaykh : Predicate of "kana" where?
The student: Second predicate for the phrase.
The Shaykh : Phrase where is its first predicate?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The preposition and genitive is the predicate of a hidden subject, or a predicate and a hidden subject estimated as "he."
The Shaykh : Predicate of a hidden subject?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Meaning it is with waw.
The student: It is with waw.
The Shaykh : What do you say, everyone? Because you are differing a little.
The student: The predicate of the first subject is connected.
The Shaykh : With waw, a preposition and genitive, predicate connected to a hidden predicate of the phrase, and the circumstantial phrase with waw, and his saying: "or with a hidden pronoun" is coordinated with his saying: "or with waw or with both".
The student: The rule?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: A rule.
The Shaykh : The rule: If the circumstantial phrase is not a present tense affirmative, it is permissible to connect it with waw alone, or with the pronoun alone, or with both together.