Continuation of the explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "Not recommended, and hidden, and what *** came as a call for aid may be stripped, know this"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : And what do you mean by saying it is stripped?
The student: It means it is stripped of the particle of address.
The Shaykh : "Know this," his saying: "Know this": Look, who among you is able to parse it? Who knows how to parse it? "Know this"?
The student: The fath is a particle of conjunction.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And its original form is fa'lamna.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The alif is a nominative pronoun built on sukun.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So he separated it with fath for the sake of the rhyme.
The Shaykh : Due to the necessity of poetry.
The student: Yes, indeed.
The Shaykh : Do you agree with that?
The student: Possible.
The Shaykh : The important thing is that the purpose of the alif is for the sake of the poetry.
The student: No, no.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Fa'lamna.
The Shaykh : Yes, fa'lamna is good. So this alif is a substitute for the light nūn of emphasis, and for this reason the verb is built with fath along with it, and the original form of fa'lam is fa'lamna.
The student: But, O Shaykh...
The Shaykh : No, that is not correct.
The student: How is it not correct?
The Shaykh : It is not appropriate; this nūn is for emphasis.
The student: But if it were in a context other than this!
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: How would its parsing be?
The Shaykh : The alif of generalization, if it is in the accusative case or something similar, it may be for generalization, but this one is not appropriate for generalization. We do not want the example; let us look at another one.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, this one is for generalization; this is correct for generalization, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Do you mean by the work?
The student: No, I mean is it with fath?
The Shaykh : And the original rule is not to assume the nūn, because assuming that the verb here is built requires taking it out of the rule, which is contrary to the original, and it is on the assumption of the nūn of emphasis. Even Ibn Malik, in this issue of parsing, says: "A noun and a verb, like 'I will not fear'", yes.
The student: It means it is stripped of the particle of address.
The Shaykh : "Know this," his saying: "Know this": Look, who among you is able to parse it? Who knows how to parse it? "Know this"?
The student: The fath is a particle of conjunction.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And its original form is fa'lamna.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The alif is a nominative pronoun built on sukun.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So he separated it with fath for the sake of the rhyme.
The Shaykh : Due to the necessity of poetry.
The student: Yes, indeed.
The Shaykh : Do you agree with that?
The student: Possible.
The Shaykh : The important thing is that the purpose of the alif is for the sake of the poetry.
The student: No, no.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Fa'lamna.
The Shaykh : Yes, fa'lamna is good. So this alif is a substitute for the light nūn of emphasis, and for this reason the verb is built with fath along with it, and the original form of fa'lam is fa'lamna.
The student: But, O Shaykh...
The Shaykh : No, that is not correct.
The student: How is it not correct?
The Shaykh : It is not appropriate; this nūn is for emphasis.
The student: But if it were in a context other than this!
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: How would its parsing be?
The Shaykh : The alif of generalization, if it is in the accusative case or something similar, it may be for generalization, but this one is not appropriate for generalization. We do not want the example; let us look at another one.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, this one is for generalization; this is correct for generalization, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Do you mean by the work?
The student: No, I mean is it with fath?
The Shaykh : And the original rule is not to assume the nūn, because assuming that the verb here is built requires taking it out of the rule, which is contrary to the original, and it is on the assumption of the nūn of emphasis. Even Ibn Malik, in this issue of parsing, says: "A noun and a verb, like 'I will not fear'", yes.