The ruling on one who intends to perform 'Umrah and then passes the miqat
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
What is the ruling on one who passes the miqat while intending to perform 'Umrah in Makkah from al-Madinah, but after arriving in Jeddah I stayed there for a period, and then I entered the state of ihram from Jeddah and went to Makkah in a state of ihram? What is obligatory upon me?
Answer:
One who passes the miqat while intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj owes a sacrificial animal. If one leaves al-Madinah and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah, while intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj, he owes a sacrificial animal to be slaughtered in Makkah for the poor. This is because he neglected the obligatory act, which is entering the state of ihram from the miqat. This applies to one who comes from Riyadh intending to perform 'Umrah and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah; he owes a sacrificial animal. Likewise, one who comes from Egypt or the Levant and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah owes a sacrificial animal, because he passed the miqat.
However, if one comes without intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj, coming to Jeddah to visit some of his brothers, or for buying and selling, with no intention of Hajj or 'Umrah, and then afterwards he resolves to perform 'Umrah, and it occurs to him to perform 'Umrah, he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah. This is because when he passed the miqat, he had no intention; he only formed the intention in Jeddah. So he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah, and there is no harm in that.
Likewise, one who leaves al-Madinah without an intention, having only intended Jeddah for buying and selling, or to visit some relatives, or for treatment, and when he arrives in Jeddah it occurs to him, and he says: "Since I am close, I would like to perform 'Umrah," he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah. Yes.
As for a person who intends from al-Madinah, or intends from Riyadh to perform 'Umrah, and then passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram, no, this is a mistake. He must enter the state of ihram from the miqat. If he passes it and enters the state of ihram from a place before it—such as Jeddah or elsewhere—he owes a sacrificial animal.
What is the ruling on one who passes the miqat while intending to perform 'Umrah in Makkah from al-Madinah, but after arriving in Jeddah I stayed there for a period, and then I entered the state of ihram from Jeddah and went to Makkah in a state of ihram? What is obligatory upon me?
Answer:
One who passes the miqat while intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj owes a sacrificial animal. If one leaves al-Madinah and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah, while intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj, he owes a sacrificial animal to be slaughtered in Makkah for the poor. This is because he neglected the obligatory act, which is entering the state of ihram from the miqat. This applies to one who comes from Riyadh intending to perform 'Umrah and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah; he owes a sacrificial animal. Likewise, one who comes from Egypt or the Levant and does not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah owes a sacrificial animal, because he passed the miqat.
However, if one comes without intending to perform 'Umrah or Hajj, coming to Jeddah to visit some of his brothers, or for buying and selling, with no intention of Hajj or 'Umrah, and then afterwards he resolves to perform 'Umrah, and it occurs to him to perform 'Umrah, he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah. This is because when he passed the miqat, he had no intention; he only formed the intention in Jeddah. So he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah, and there is no harm in that.
Likewise, one who leaves al-Madinah without an intention, having only intended Jeddah for buying and selling, or to visit some relatives, or for treatment, and when he arrives in Jeddah it occurs to him, and he says: "Since I am close, I would like to perform 'Umrah," he enters the state of ihram from Jeddah. Yes.
As for a person who intends from al-Madinah, or intends from Riyadh to perform 'Umrah, and then passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram, no, this is a mistake. He must enter the state of ihram from the miqat. If he passes it and enters the state of ihram from a place before it—such as Jeddah or elsewhere—he owes a sacrificial animal.
Source
binbaz.org.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.