The Discussion on the Doer
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: No, it cannot be in the accusative case, because the author says "the nominative"
The Shaykh : Because the author says the nominative, so it cannot be in the accusative case. Now, is it possible for the doer to precede the verb? What is your name?
The student: Rā'id
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: Rā'id
The Shaykh : Rā'id, yes. Is it possible for the doer to precede the verb?
The student: If it precedes, it is not a doer.
The Shaykh : Where do you take that from the author's words?
The student: From his saying "the one mentioned before it..."
The Shaykh :"the one mentioned before it is its verb" Well done. Now, what do you say, O Bukhari, about a man who informed us of Zayd's standing up and said, "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah)? He informed us that Zayd is standing, so he said, "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah).
The student: Error
The Shaykh : Here, what is it?
The student: Error
The Shaykh : It is a mistake. What is the correct form?
The student: Zayd stood up (with dammah).
The Shaykh : "Zayd stood up" (with dammah). What made you know that "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah) is a mistake and "Zayd stood up" (with dammah) is correct?
The student: Because "Zayd stood up" preceded...
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: The operator precedes...
The Shaykh : No, "qāma" (stood up). He said "qāma." Let's leave it for tonight regarding prepositions. Here.
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Heh.
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Now, do you have only this explanation?
The student: "Qāma Zayd." Zayd is the doer, and the doer must be in the nominative case...
The Shaykh : Well done. Because Zayd is the doer, and the doer must be in the nominative case. Now, according to the author's words, the doer is divided into what? Yes. Now.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The student: Seven.
The Shaykh : how
The student: Seven.
The Shaykh : What is the doer divided into? Seven? Yes, O Hamad.
The student: The doer is divided into two categories: apparent and hidden.
The Shaykh : Into two categories: apparent and hidden. Now, the apparent is apparent, and the hidden is...
The student: The author says "such as your saying 'I struck,' 'you struck,' 'we struck,' and 'you struck'"
The Shaykh : That is enough, as long as you said "such as your saying," that is sufficient. Now, "I struck" is for whom?
The student: For the speaker.
The Shaykh : "I struck."
The student: For the speaker.
The Shaykh : For the speaker. And "you struck."
The student: Also for the speaker.
The Shaykh : So the speaker has both a dammah and a fathah, meaning "I struck" is I, and "you struck" is I. How?
The student: "You struck" is for the one being addressed.
The Shaykh : "You struck" is for the one being addressed. Good. And "you struck" (feminine).
The student: For the female being addressed.
The Shaykh : For the female being addressed. Perfect. Now we will parse. We will take the parsing of "I think" from the beginning. Here.
The student: We took it.
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: The second.
Another student: We went back to the first, then the second.
The Shaykh : We finished the first in the review.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: ... the first.
The Shaykh : Meaning he stopped at the last...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, good. Come on...
The student: I parsed it.
The Shaykh : "Qāma" I parsed. "Qāma al-rijulān" (The two men stood up).
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: "Al-rijulān" (the two men) is the doer, in the nominative case.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The sign of its nominative case is the alif...
The Shaykh : The alif.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : In place of the dammah. Here, because it is...
The student: A dual
The Shaykh : Dual. Yes.
The Shaykh : Because the author says the nominative, so it cannot be in the accusative case. Now, is it possible for the doer to precede the verb? What is your name?
The student: Rā'id
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: Rā'id
The Shaykh : Rā'id, yes. Is it possible for the doer to precede the verb?
The student: If it precedes, it is not a doer.
The Shaykh : Where do you take that from the author's words?
The student: From his saying "the one mentioned before it..."
The Shaykh :"the one mentioned before it is its verb" Well done. Now, what do you say, O Bukhari, about a man who informed us of Zayd's standing up and said, "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah)? He informed us that Zayd is standing, so he said, "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah).
The student: Error
The Shaykh : Here, what is it?
The student: Error
The Shaykh : It is a mistake. What is the correct form?
The student: Zayd stood up (with dammah).
The Shaykh : "Zayd stood up" (with dammah). What made you know that "Zayd stood up" (with kasrah) is a mistake and "Zayd stood up" (with dammah) is correct?
The student: Because "Zayd stood up" preceded...
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: The operator precedes...
The Shaykh : No, "qāma" (stood up). He said "qāma." Let's leave it for tonight regarding prepositions. Here.
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Heh.
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Now, do you have only this explanation?
The student: "Qāma Zayd." Zayd is the doer, and the doer must be in the nominative case...
The Shaykh : Well done. Because Zayd is the doer, and the doer must be in the nominative case. Now, according to the author's words, the doer is divided into what? Yes. Now.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The student: Seven.
The Shaykh : how
The student: Seven.
The Shaykh : What is the doer divided into? Seven? Yes, O Hamad.
The student: The doer is divided into two categories: apparent and hidden.
The Shaykh : Into two categories: apparent and hidden. Now, the apparent is apparent, and the hidden is...
The student: The author says "such as your saying 'I struck,' 'you struck,' 'we struck,' and 'you struck'"
The Shaykh : That is enough, as long as you said "such as your saying," that is sufficient. Now, "I struck" is for whom?
The student: For the speaker.
The Shaykh : "I struck."
The student: For the speaker.
The Shaykh : For the speaker. And "you struck."
The student: Also for the speaker.
The Shaykh : So the speaker has both a dammah and a fathah, meaning "I struck" is I, and "you struck" is I. How?
The student: "You struck" is for the one being addressed.
The Shaykh : "You struck" is for the one being addressed. Good. And "you struck" (feminine).
The student: For the female being addressed.
The Shaykh : For the female being addressed. Perfect. Now we will parse. We will take the parsing of "I think" from the beginning. Here.
The student: We took it.
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: The second.
Another student: We went back to the first, then the second.
The Shaykh : We finished the first in the review.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Ah?
The student: ... the first.
The Shaykh : Meaning he stopped at the last...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, good. Come on...
The student: I parsed it.
The Shaykh : "Qāma" I parsed. "Qāma al-rijulān" (The two men stood up).
The student: "Qāma" is a past tense verb.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: "Al-rijulān" (the two men) is the doer, in the nominative case.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The sign of its nominative case is the alif...
The Shaykh : The alif.
The student: In place of the dammah.
The Shaykh : In place of the dammah. Here, because it is...
The student: A dual
The Shaykh : Dual. Yes.